Who influences policy labs in the European Union? A social network approach

Abstract The growing importance of public innovation has been manifested through the creation of policy labs: spaces for policy experimentation and innovation that work for or within a government entity. The rise of this phenomenon in Europe was evidenced by the creation of a policy lab by the European Commission (EC) in 2016 and the publication by the EC of a report identifying policy labs and their influencers in Europe. Public innovation is increasingly based on national and international networks, giving rise to complex ecosystems involving participation by multiple actors from countries with different administrative approaches. Our study uses social network analysis of these labs’ Twitter profile data to map the European Union’s (EU) public innovation ecosystem and identify the major influencers. Policy labs and their influencers are analyzed by administration style by using a large geographical database. The results reveal a complex global network of influencers and a strong predominance of the Anglo-Saxon administration style. From an EU perspective, our systematic analysis of influence is particularly important in the post-Brexit context, helping to foster a genuine public innovation ecosystem that is both autonomous and interconnected with the aim of facing challenges such as the Sustainable Development Agenda and COVID-19 crisis recovery.

[1]  Ulf Hjelmar.  The institutionalization of public sector innovation , 2021, Public Management Review.

[2]  C. Greve,et al.  Public governance paradigms: competing and co-existing , 2020, Local Government Studies.

[3]  Ingmar van Meerkerk,et al.  Innovating and optimizing in public organizations: does more become less? , 2020, Public Management Review.

[4]  Lisa M. Sanchez,et al.  Social Media Influence and Electoral Competition , 2020, Social Science Computer Review.

[5]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  When design meets power: design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking , 2020, Policy & Politics.

[6]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  Improving public policy and administration: exploring the potential of design , 2020, Policy & Politics.

[7]  Yin Zhang,et al.  Instagrammers, Fashionistas, and Me: Recurrent Fashion Recommendation with Implicit Visual Influence , 2019, CIKM.

[8]  Esteban Romero-Frías,et al.  Policy labs in Europe: political innovation, structure and content analysis on Twitter , 2018, El Profesional de la Información.

[9]  Yotam Shmargad.  Twitter Influencers in the 2016 US Congressional Races , 2018, Journal of Political Marketing.

[10]  Mohammed A. Gharawi,et al.  Transnational public sector knowledge networks: A comparative study of contextual distances , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Yiwei Gong,et al.  Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  The use of YouTube in western European municipalities , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Michael McGann,et al.  The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy , 2018 .

[14]  M. Bolívar.  Creative citizenship: the new wave for collaborative environments in smart cities , 2018 .

[15]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  Antecedents of consumer intention to follow and recommend an Instagram account , 2017, Online Inf. Rev..

[16]  R. Kattel,et al.  Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? , 2017 .

[17]  N. Dotti.  Learning from implementation and evaluation of the eu cohesion policy. Lessons from a research-policy dialogue. , 2016 .

[18]  Nan Wang,et al.  Identification of Influential Online Social Network Users Based on Multi-Features , 2016, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[19]  King-Wa Fu,et al.  Challenging Official Propaganda? Public Opinion Leaders on Sina Weibo* , 2016, The China Quarterly.

[20]  Antonello Zanfei,et al.  Governance and innovation in public sector services: The case of the digital library , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Rui Duan,et al.  Identifying effective influencers based on trust for electronic word-of-mouth marketing: A domain-aware approach , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Andreas Klein,et al.  Social activity and structural centrality in online social networks , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[23]  Ebru Uzunoglu,et al.  Brand communication through digital influencers: Leveraging blogger engagement , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[24]  Miguel Del-Fresno-García,et al.  Haciendo visible lo invisible: visualización de la estructura de las relaciones en red en Twitter por medio del análisis de redes sociales , 2014 .

[25]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  Information network or social network?: the structure of the twitter follow graph , 2014, WWW.

[26]  Zhiguo Zhu,et al.  Discovering the influential users oriented to viral marketing based on online social networks , 2013 .

[27]  Yong Seog Kim,et al.  Assessing the ripple effects of online opinion leaders with trust and distrust metrics , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  The effects of blogger recommendations on customers' online shopping intentions , 2013, Internet Res..

[29]  Jacob Torfing,et al.  Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector , 2011 .

[30]  S. Osborne.  The new public governance? : emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance , 2010 .

[31]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[32]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[33]  Sonia Royo,et al.  ARE ICTs IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE EU REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2007 .

[34]  B. Lyons,et al.  Opinion leadership in a computer-mediated environment , 2005 .

[35]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present , 2005 .

[36]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Break-Through Innovations and Continuous Improvement: Two Different Models of Innovative Processes in the Public Sector , 2005 .

[37]  L. Torres.  Trajectories in public administration reforms in European Continental countries , 2004 .

[38]  O. Holsti.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[39]  K. Olejniczak,et al.  Policy labs: the next frontier of policy design and evaluation? , 2016 .

[40]  Sonia Royo,et al.  E‐Participation and Environmental Protection: Are Local Governments Really Committed? , 2014 .

[41]  Lars Tummers,et al.  Embarking on the social innovation journey: A systematic review regarding the potential of co-creation with citizens , 2013 .

[42]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  C. Pollitt,et al.  Public management reform : a comparative analysis - new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian State , 2011 .

[44]  M. Painter,et al.  The Analysis of Administrative Traditions , 2010 .

[45]  Ted G. Lewis,et al.  Network Science: Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[46]  P. Bonacich.  Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .