NEW, TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS IN INNOVATION NETWORKS SYMPLECTIC AND GENERATIVE IMPACTS

Abstract The traditional body of research on new, technology-based firms reflects the linear sequential view of the technological innovation process. The ‘modern’ innovation theory views the innovation process as a complex, interative process, that is essentially systemic in character. The systemic view of the technological innovation process largely remains to be implemented in research on new, technology-based firms. The present study represents an attempt to bridge this gap, by applying a systemic approach to research on new, technology-based firms. The empirical part of the present study develops and empirically tests a model that classifies new, technology-based firms into science-based firms and engineering-based firms. The two categories are defined in terms of the functional relationship between the new, technology-based firm and the articulation process of basic technologies. In the model, new, technology-based firms are analyzed in terms of the systemic knowledge conversion process to which they are attached. The model receives support in three empirical databases, compiled among new, technology-based firms in Finland, the United Kingdom, and Silicon Valley. The analysis of the Silicon Valley database is the first ever systematic survey of the spin-off firms of Stanford University.

[1]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Technology: A basic study of innovators; how to keep and capitalize on their talents , 1968 .

[2]  M. Scott,et al.  Five stages of growth in small business , 1987 .

[3]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[4]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions , 1994 .

[5]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Theories of the firm: contractual and competence perspectives , 1993 .

[6]  E. Poza.  Smart growth : critical choices for business continuity and prosperity , 1989 .

[7]  C. Hull,et al.  Helping Small Firms Grow : An Implementation Approach , 1987 .

[8]  J. McCalman.  Management of innovation in high technology small firms , 1988 .

[9]  R. Lamb,et al.  Competitive strategic management , 1984 .

[10]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of the Impact of Task Scope on Employee Performance , 1976 .

[11]  R. Garud,et al.  Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .

[12]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[13]  Robert H. Keeley,et al.  Predictors of success in new technology based ventures , 1990 .

[14]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  The roles of science in technological innovation , 1993 .

[15]  E. Penrose,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[16]  R. Rothwell.  Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[17]  N. Churchill,et al.  The Five Stages of Small Business Growth , 1983 .

[18]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  The technological base of the new enterprise , 1991 .

[19]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[20]  C. S. P. Monck,et al.  Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms, C.S.P. Monck, R.B. Porter, P.R. Quintas, and D.J. Storey. 1988. Routledge. 224 pages. ISBN: 0-415-00092-0. $69.50 , 1988 .

[21]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  The process of technology transfer to the new biomedical and pharmaceutical firm , 1986 .

[22]  Frederick Arthur Webster.  A Model for New Venture Initiation: A Discourse on Rapacity and the Independent Entrepreneur , 1976 .

[23]  Joe Tidd,et al.  Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks the case of home automation , 1995 .

[24]  G. Willard,et al.  Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms , 1990 .

[25]  S. Slatter,et al.  Gambling on Growth: How to Manage the Small High-Tech Firm , 1992 .

[26]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[27]  D. Keeble,et al.  New firms and rural industrialization in East Anglia , 1984 .

[28]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  The Dynamic Analysis of Innovation and Diffusion: A Study in Process Control , 1989 .

[29]  Henry E. Kyburg.  Science and Reason , 1990 .

[30]  A. Grandori,et al.  Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms , 1995 .

[31]  J. E. Forrest,et al.  Strategic Alliances between Large and Small Research Intensive Organizations: Experiences in the Biotechnology Industry , 1992 .

[32]  R. Rothwell.  Innovation and Firm Size: A Case for Dynamic Complementarity; or, is Small Really so Beautiful? , 1983 .

[33]  Margherita Balconi,et al.  The Notion of Industry and Knowledge Bases: The Evidence of Steel and Mini-mills , 1993 .

[34]  Marc Cowling,et al.  Employment change in independent owner-managed high-technology firms in Great Britain , 1995 .

[35]  Jens Frøslev Christensen.  Asset profiles for technological innovation , 1995 .

[36]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[37]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .

[38]  D. Teece.  The Competitive challenge : strategies for industrial innovation and renewal : the Transamerica lectures in corporate strategy, School of Business, University of California, Berkely , 1987 .

[39]  D. Audretsch.  Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1995 .

[40]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[41]  R. Oakey,et al.  High Technology Small Firms , 1984 .

[42]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[43]  Max Boisot,et al.  Is your firm a creative destroyer? Competitive learning and knowledge flows in the technological strategies of firms , 1995 .

[44]  E. Autio,et al.  New Technology-Based Companies in the United Kingdom and in Finland.A Comparative Study , 1993 .

[45]  Jacqueline Senker,et al.  Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies , 1994 .

[46]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[47]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[48]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  External networking and innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe , 1991 .

[49]  J. Prescott,et al.  Strategies, styles, and structures of small product innovative firms in high and low technology industries , 1990 .

[50]  Calestous Juma,et al.  Long-run economics: An evolutionary approach to economic growth , 1987 .

[51]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[52]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[53]  Ari-Pekka Hameri,et al.  The structure and dynamics of technological systems: a conceptual model , 1995 .

[54]  P. Westhead.  Survival and Employment Growth Contrasts between Types of Owner-Managed High-Technology Firms , 1995 .

[55]  Styrelsen för teknisk utveckling,et al.  Measuring the dynamics of technological change , 1990 .

[56]  James B. Wade.  Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market , 1995 .

[57]  Eric Flamholtz,et al.  Growing pains : how to make the transition from an entrepreneurship to a professionally managed firm , 1986 .

[58]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  Why the future is not what it was: New models of evolution , 1990 .

[59]  D. Storey.  Understanding the small business sector , 1994 .

[60]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983 , 1989 .

[61]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Technological Competencies in the World's Largest Firms: Characteristics, Constraints and Scope for Managerial Choice , 1995 .

[62]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Understanding Technical Change As an Evolutionary Process , 1987 .

[63]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[64]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[65]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[66]  Roberto Camagni,et al.  Innovation Networks , 1991 .

[67]  Sergio Bruno,et al.  The behaviour of the innovative firm: Relations to the environment , 1990 .

[68]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[69]  K. Pavitt.  What We Know about the Strategic Management of Technology , 1990 .