Parametric Response Maps of Perfusion MRI May Identify Recurrent Glioblastomas Responsive to Bevacizumab and Irinotecan

Background Perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) can be used to measure key aspects of tumor vascularity in vivo and recent studies suggest that perfusion imaging may be useful in the early assessment of response to angiogenesis inhibitors. Aim of this work is to compare Parametric Response Maps (PRMs) with the Region Of Interest (ROI) approach in the analysis of tumor changes induced by bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent glioblastomas (rGBM), and to evaluate if changes in tumor blood volume measured by perfusion MRI may predict clinical outcome. Methods 42 rGBM patients with KPS ≥50 were treated until progression, as defined by MRI with RANO criteria. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) variation after 8 weeks of treatment was calculated through semi-automatic ROI placement in the same anatomic region as in baseline. Alternatively, rCBV variations with respect to baseline were calculated into the evolving tumor region using a voxel-by-voxel difference. PRMs were created showing where rCBV significantly increased, decreased or remained unchanged. Results An increased blood volume in PRM (PRMCBV+) higher than 18% (first quartile) after 8 weeks of treatment was associated with increased progression free survival (PFS; 24 versus 13 weeks, p = 0.045) and overall survival (OS; 38 versus 25 weeks, p = 0.016). After 8 weeks of treatment ROI analysis showed that mean rCBV remained elevated in non responsive patients (4.8±0.9 versus 5.1±1.2, p = 0.38), whereas decreased in responsive patients (4.2±1.3 versus 3.8±1.6 p = 0.04), and re-increased progressively when patients approached tumor progression. Conclusions Our data suggest that PRMs can provide an early marker of response to antiangiogenic treatment and warrant further confirmation in a larger cohort of GBM patients.

[1]  B. Rosen,et al.  Improved tumor oxygenation and survival in glioblastoma patients who show increased blood perfusion after cediranib and chemoradiation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  E. Prodi,et al.  Prognostic Value of CD109+ Circulating Endothelial Cells in Recurrent Glioblastomas Treated with Bevacizumab and Irinotecan , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy as an early indicator of response to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: RTOG 0625/ACRIN 6677. , 2013, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  L. Ellis,et al.  Predictive Biomarkers for Bevacizumab: Are We There Yet? , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  D. Yousem,et al.  ADC values and prognosis of malignant astrocytomas: does lower ADC predict a worse prognosis independent of grade of tumor?--a meta-analysis. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  G. Bergers,et al.  Mechanisms of evasive resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in glioblastoma. , 2013, CNS oncology.

[7]  A. Matsumura,et al.  Decrease in the apparent diffusion coefficient in peritumoral edema for the assessment of recurrent glioblastoma treated by bevacizumab. , 2013, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[8]  Albert Lai,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis stratifies progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab: a multi-center study , 2012, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[9]  W. Mason,et al.  Antiangiogenic therapies in glioblastoma multiforme , 2012, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[10]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  Increased survival of glioblastoma patients who respond to antiangiogenic therapy with elevated blood perfusion. , 2012, Cancer research.

[11]  Soonmee Cha,et al.  Imaging diagnosis of brain metastasis. , 2012, Progress in neurological surgery.

[12]  P. Specenier Bevacizumab in glioblastoma multiforme , 2012, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[13]  J. Debbins,et al.  Correlations between Perfusion MR Imaging Cerebral Blood Volume, Microvessel Quantification, and Clinical Outcome Using Stereotactic Analysis in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[14]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis , 2011, Nature.

[15]  M S Brown,et al.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis Stratifies Progression-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed Bevacizumab-Treated Glioblastoma , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Parametric Response Map–Derived MRI Biomarkers: Identification of Early and Distinct Glioma Response Patterns Not Predicted by Standard Radiographic Assessment , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  Bevacizumab: current updates in treatment , 2010, Current opinion in oncology.

[18]  S. Maier,et al.  Diffusion imaging of brain tumors , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[19]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  Parametric response map as an imaging biomarker to distinguish progression from pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  J. Raizer,et al.  Glioblastoma: a method for predicting response to antiangiogenic chemotherapy by using MR perfusion imaging--pilot study. , 2010, Radiology.

[22]  A. Jackson,et al.  Enhancing Fraction in Glioma and Its Relationship to the Tumoral Vascular Microenvironment: A Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging Study , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[23]  M. Chamberlain Radiographic patterns of relapse in glioblastoma , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[24]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  The parametric response map is an imaging biomarker for early cancer treatment outcome , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[25]  Douglas C. Miller,et al.  Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. , 2008, Radiology.

[26]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Comparison of region‐of‐interest analysis with three different histogram analysis methods in the determination of perfusion metrics in patients with brain gliomas , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  G Johnson,et al.  Histogram analysis versus region of interest analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging data in the grading of cerebral gliomas. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  Bradford A Moffat,et al.  Functional diffusion map: a noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  M. Ichihara,et al.  Expression of CD109 in human cancer , 2004, Oncogene.

[31]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[32]  G Johnson,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas treated with thalidomide and carboplatin. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[33]  M Takahashi,et al.  Posttherapeutic intraaxial brain tumor: the value of perfusion-sensitive contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating tumor recurrence from nonneoplastic contrast-enhancing tissue. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.