The current use of patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review.

AIM To provide an update on the use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the field of implant dentistry (1); to compare PROMs for prostheses supported by one or more implants to alternative treatment options or a healthy dentition (2). MATERIALS AND METHODS The dental literature was searched on PubMed until December 31, 2014, using a general search algorithm. An overall quantitative analysis was performed, and a qualitative appraisal was made on the output of the last 6 years. Per type of edentulism and prosthetic treatment, the general search algorithm was refined in order to select controlled studies comparing PROMs for prostheses supported by one or more implants to alternative treatment options or a healthy dentition. RESULTS With nearly half of the output (300 of 635) published in the last 6 years, there is a growing interest in PROMs by the scientific community. When scrutinizing the 300 most recent publications, only 84 controlled studies could be identified among which 38 RCTs and 31 cohort studies. An "ad hoc" approach is commonly employed using non-standardized questions and different scoring methods, which may compromise validity and reliability. Overall, 39 eligible papers related to fully edentulous patients treated with an implant overdenture (IOD) and 9 to fully edentulous patients treated with a fixed implant prosthesis (FIP). There is plenty of evidence from well-controlled studies showing that fully edentulous patients in the mandible experience higher satisfaction with an IOD when compared to a conventional denture (CD). This may not hold true for fully edentulous patients in the maxilla. In general, fully edentulous patients seem to opt for a fixed or removable rehabilitation on implants for specific reasons. Data pertaining to partially edentulous patients were limited (FIP: n = 6; single implants: n = 16). In these patients, the timing of implant placement does not seem to affect patient satisfaction. Patients seem to prefer straightforward implant surgery over complex surgery that includes bone grafting. CONCLUSION There is an urgent need for standardized reporting of PROMs in the field of implant dentistry. Fully edentulous patients in the mandible experience higher satisfaction with an IOD when compared to a CD. All other types of prostheses have been underexposed to research.

[1]  M. Sanz,et al.  A randomized trial on the aesthetic outcomes of implant-supported restorations with zirconia or titanium abutments. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  A. Vissink,et al.  Single crowns in the resorbed posterior maxilla supported by either 6-mm implants or by 11-mm implants combined with sinus floor elevation surgery: a 1-year randomised controlled trial. , 2014, European journal of oral implantology.

[3]  G. Benic,et al.  Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[4]  J. Dudley.  Maxillary implant overdentures: current controversies. , 2013, Australian dental journal.

[5]  M. Bessadet,et al.  The impact of implant treatment on oral health related quality of life in a private dental practice: a prospective cohort study , 2013, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[6]  CL Soh,et al.  Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome , 2013, BDJ.

[7]  F Müller,et al.  Implant-supported Mandibular Overdentures in Very Old Adults , 2013, Journal of dental research.

[8]  R. Weiger,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Implants versus Fixed Dental Prostheses , 2013, Journal of dental research.

[9]  Mandana Hosseini,et al.  A 3-year prospective study of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic materials in patients with tooth agenesis. , 2013, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Four modalities of single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic evaluation. , 2013, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[11]  J. Smith-Palmer,et al.  Evaluating the health economic implications and cost-effectiveness of dental implants: a literature review. , 2013, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  M. A. Elsyad,et al.  Marginal bone loss around unsplinted mini-implants supporting maxillary overdentures: a preliminary comparative study between partial and full palatal coverage. , 2013, Quintessence international.

[13]  A. Vissink,et al.  Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region; 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  Yining Wang,et al.  Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments. , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  W. Thomson,et al.  Patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction with mandibular two-implant overdentures using different attachment systems: 5-year outcomes. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[16]  A. Čelebić,et al.  A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. , 2012, Gerodontology.

[17]  A. Carreiro,et al.  The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency. , 2012, Gerodontology.

[18]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  A case-control study assessing oral-health-related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[19]  W. Thomson,et al.  Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[20]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Comparison of speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in subjects with single-tooth implants, fixed implant prosthetics or conventional removable prostheses. , 2012, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[21]  G O Gallucci,et al.  Success Criteria in Implant Dentistry , 2012, Journal of dental research.

[22]  N. Lang,et al.  Clinical research in implant dentistry: evaluation of implant-supported restorations, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  C. McGrath,et al.  An evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures in dental implant research among dentate subjects. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  M. Esposito,et al.  Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. , 2012, European journal of oral implantology.

[25]  M. Esposito,et al.  Immediate versus early loading of 6.5 mm-long flapless-placed single implants: a 4-year after loading report of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial. , 2012, European journal of oral implantology.

[26]  H. Weber,et al.  Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients. , 2011, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[27]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. , 2011, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[28]  D. R. Burns,et al.  Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment. , 2011, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  Nestor Cohenca,et al.  Quality of life of endodontically treated versus implant treated patients: a University-based qualitative research study. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[30]  O. Geçkili,et al.  A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. , 2011, The Journal of oral implantology.

[31]  J. Katsoulis,et al.  Maintenance of implant-supported maxillary prostheses: a 2-year controlled clinical trial. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[32]  U. Belser,et al.  Esthetic outcomes with porcelain-fused-to-ceramic and all-ceramic single-implant crowns: a randomized clinical trial. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[33]  M. Esposito,et al.  Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial. , 2011, European journal of oral implantology.

[34]  G. Watzek,et al.  Progress and trends in patients' mindset on dental implants. II: implant acceptance, patient-perceived costs and patient satisfaction. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[35]  Mandana Hosseini,et al.  A 1-year randomised controlled trial comparing zirconia versus metal-ceramic implant supported single-tooth restorations. , 2011, European journal of oral implantology.

[36]  L. Cooper,et al.  Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[37]  Wael Att,et al.  Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. , 2010, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[38]  B. Al-Nawas,et al.  A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report. , 2009, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[39]  P. Henry,et al.  The immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 36-month prospective study. , 2010, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[40]  Luis C F Frasca,et al.  Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses. , 2009, Journal of oral science.

[41]  J. Ellis,et al.  Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[42]  R. Mericske-Stern,et al.  Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results. , 2009, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[43]  R. H. Batenburg,et al.  Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[44]  Anita Visser,et al.  Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[45]  L. Schropp,et al.  Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction following full-flap elevation for early and delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a 5-year randomized study. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[46]  Syngcuk Kim,et al.  A review of factors influencing treatment planning decisions of single-tooth implants versus preserving natural teeth with nonsurgical endodontic therapy. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[47]  G. Liddelow.  The immediately loaded single implant retained mandibular overdenture: a 3 year prospective study , 2008 .

[48]  M. Esposito,et al.  Immediate versus early loading of 7-mm-long flapless-placed single implants: a split-mouth randomised controlled clinical trial. , 2008, European journal of oral implantology.

[49]  G. Heydecke,et al.  How do patients perceive the benefit of reconstructive dentistry with regard to oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction? A systematic review. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[50]  N. Lang,et al.  What are the longevities of teeth and oral implants? , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[51]  D. Locker,et al.  A prospective study on immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: patient-mediated and economic outcomes. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[52]  G. Heydecke,et al.  Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[53]  P. F. Allen,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Implant-retained Mandibular Overdentures , 2006, Journal of dental research.

[54]  Guido Heydecke,et al.  The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults Results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[55]  B. Pjetursson,et al.  Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[56]  R. H. Batenburg,et al.  Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[57]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. , 2005, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[58]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[59]  R. Timmerman,et al.  An Eight-year Follow-up to a Randomized Clinical Trial of Participant Satisfaction with Three Types of Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[60]  G. Heydecke,et al.  Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Part 1--Characteristics of the studies. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[61]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[62]  J. P. Lund,et al.  Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[63]  G. Heydecke,et al.  Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. , 2003, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[64]  K. Stellingsma,et al.  Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[65]  J. P. Lund,et al.  Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[66]  G. Heydecke,et al.  Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[67]  A. Vissink,et al.  A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction. , 2003, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[68]  H. Yatani,et al.  Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[69]  J. Walton,et al.  One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[70]  R. M. Diener,et al.  A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part V: food preference comparisons. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[71]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Patient evaluation of treatment with fixed implant‐ supported partial dentures , 2001 .

[72]  G. Raghoebar,et al.  Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 6-year results of a multicenter clinical trial on 3 different implant systems. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[73]  D. Walshaw,et al.  A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[74]  J. P. Lund,et al.  Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: patient-based outcomes. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[75]  N. Zitzmann,et al.  Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part I: patients' assessments. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[76]  N. Zitzmann,et al.  Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part II: clinical findings. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[77]  D. Steenberghe,et al.  A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[78]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  Patient's opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Brånemark implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental practices. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[79]  D. van Steenberghe,et al.  A randomised clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in mandibular overdenture therapy , 1997, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[80]  D. Wismeijer,et al.  Patient satisfaction with implant-supp0rted mandibular overdentures A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants Trauma; oral surgery , 1997 .

[81]  M. V. van’t Hof,et al.  Two-center clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus complete dentures-chewing ability. , 1996, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[82]  M. V. van’t Hof,et al.  Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants--a multicentre randomized clinical trial. , 1995, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[83]  D. R. Burns,et al.  Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part II--Patient satisfaction and preference. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[84]  J. Lund,et al.  Within-subject Comparisons of Implant-supported Mandibular Prostheses: Psychometric Evaluation , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[85]  J. Lund,et al.  Within-subject Comparisons of Implant-supported Mandibular Prostheses: Choice of Prosthesis , 1994, Journal of dental research.