Perioperative Epidural Analgesia and Outcome After Major Abdominal Surgery in High-Risk Patients

In a primary analysis of a large recently completed randomized trial in 915 high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, we found no difference in outcome between patients receiving perioperative epidural analgesia and those receiving IV opioids, apart from the incidence of respiratory failure. Therefore, we performed a selected number of predetermined subgroup analyses to identify specific types of patients who may have derived benefit from epidural analgesia. We found no difference in outcome between epidural and control groups in subgroups at increased risk of respiratory or cardiac complications or undergoing aortic surgery, nor in a subgroup with failed epidural block (all P > 0.05). There was a small reduction in the duration of postoperative ventilation (geometric mean [sd]: control group, 0.3 [6.5] h, versus epidural group, 0.2 [4.8] h;P = 0.048). No differences were found in length of stay in intensive care or in the hospital. There was no relationship between frequency of use of epidural analgesia in routine practice outside the trial and benefit from epidural analgesia in the trial. We found no evidence that perioperative epidural analgesia significantly influences major morbidity or mortality after major abdominal surgery.

[1]  P. Myles,et al.  Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  W. S. Beattie,et al.  Epidural Analgesia Reduces Postoperative Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  Jon S Thompson,et al.  Effect of Epidural Anesthesia and Analgesia on Perioperative Outcome: A Randomized, Controlled Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Anthony Rodgers,et al.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  P. Myles,et al.  Design of the multicenter Australian study of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in major surgery: the MASTER trial. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[6]  P. Myles,et al.  Why we need large randomized studies in anaesthesia. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  F. Mosteller,et al.  The Comparative Effects of Postoperative Analgesic Therapies on Pulmonary Outcome: Cumulative Meta-Analyses of Randomized, Controlled Trials , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[9]  G. Grégoire,et al.  Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  S. Zarich,et al.  Cardiac Outcome after Peripheral Vascular Surgery: Comparison of General and Regional Anesthesia , 1996, Anesthesiology.

[11]  R Peto,et al.  Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? , 1984, Statistics in medicine.