Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE To provide clinically useful vibration threshold normal values. METHODS The graduated Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork was evaluated in 198 healthy controls and 59 patients with a polyneuropathy. The measures were done in triplicate at four locations: the distal interphalangeal joint of the index finger, ulnar styloid process, interphalangeal joint of the hallux, and internal malleolus. The values obtained with this tuning fork in healthy controls and patients with polyneuropathy were compared with the values of an electronic device, the Vibrameter. RESULTS Vibration sense was better perceived in the arms compared with the legs. There was a significant age related decline of vibration sense at all locations. The values from the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and the Vibrameter were significantly correlated in both groups. The sensitivity of these two instruments for the four sites examined in the polyneuropathy group ranged from 29–76% and 31–73%, respectively and was the highest at the hallux for both instruments. CONCLUSION This study provides clinical useful normal values of vibration threshold for the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork. This is a simple and easily applicable instrument that assesses vibration sense semiquantitatively and should therefore have a place in routine neurological examination.

[1]  Arezzo Jc,et al.  The use of the optacon as a screening device. A new technique for detecting sensory loss in individuals exposed to neurotoxins. , 1980 .

[2]  Janice E. Knoefel,et al.  Clinical neurology of aging, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[3]  T. Howell Senile deterioration of the central nervous system; a clinical study. , 1949, British medical journal.

[4]  T. Howell Senile Deterioration of the Central Nervous System , 1949 .

[5]  J. Assal,et al.  The Tuning Fork Revisited , 1990, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[6]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Standardised method of determining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation. , 1979, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  R C Bickerton,et al.  The Origin of the Tuning Fork , 1987, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[8]  A. Boulton,et al.  The Clinical Diagnosis of Sensory Neuropathy in Elderly People , 1993, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[9]  C. Thivolet,et al.  Measuring Vibration Sensations With Graduated Tuning Fork: Simple and Reliable Means to Detect Diabetic Patients at Risk of Neuropathic Foot Ulceration , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[10]  Gerald H. J. Pearson,et al.  EFFECT OF AGE ON VIBRATORY SENSIBILITY , 1928 .

[11]  J. Arezzo,et al.  The use of the optacon as a screening device. A new technique for detecting sensory loss in individuals exposed to neurotoxins. , 1980, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[12]  P G Wiles,et al.  Vibration Perception Threshold: Influence of Age, Height, Sex, and Smoking, and Calculation of Accurate Centile Values , 1991, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[13]  R. Bossemeyer,et al.  Neurological manifestations of aging. , 1977, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  L. Wahren,et al.  Variability of sensory threshold determination in clinical use , 1981, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[15]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Body sway and vibration perception thresholds in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. , 1995, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  P. Sönksen,et al.  Use of a biothesiometer to measure individual vibration thresholds and their variation in 519 non-diabetic subjects. , 1984, British medical journal.

[17]  N. Hotta,et al.  Use of the C64 quantitative tuning fork and the effect of niceritrol in diabetic neuropathy. , 1994, Clinical therapeutics.

[18]  THE EFFECT OF AGE AND PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION ON THE PERCEPTION OF VIBRATION. , 1963, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Griffin,et al.  Axonal transport in neurological disease , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[20]  S. Toleikis,et al.  Aging and quantitative sensory thresholds. , 1990, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  D. Claus,et al.  [Perception of vibration. Normal findings and methodologic aspects]. , 1988, Der Nervenarzt.

[22]  B. Stemper,et al.  Vibrameter testing facilitates the diagnosis of uremic and alcoholic polyneuropathy , 1995, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[23]  J. Assal,et al.  Additional Factors Associated with Plantar Ulcers in Diabetic Neuropathy , 1988, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[24]  A. Filla,et al.  Influence of age, gender, height and education on vibration sense A study by tuning fork in 192 normal subjects , 1991, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[25]  THE EFFECT OF AGE AND PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION ON THE PERCEPTION OF VIBRATION. , 1963 .