The Correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise Ratings for British Library and Information Science University departments
暂无分享,去创建一个
A citation study was carried out on all 217 academics who teach in UK library and information science schools. These authors between them received 622 citations in Social Scisearch for articles they had published between 1988 and the present. The results were ranked by department, and compared to the ratings awarded to the departments in the 1992 Universities Funding Council Research Assessment Exercise. Using the Spearman Rank Order Correlation coefficient, it was found that there is a statistically significant correlation between the numbers of citations received by a department in total, or the average number of citations received in the department per academic, and the Research Assessment Exercise rating. The paper concludes that this provides further independent support for the validity of citation counting, even when using just the first authors as a search tool for cited references. The paper also concludes that the cost and effort of the Research Assessment Exercise may not be justified when a simpler and cheaper alternative, namely a citation counting exercise, could be undertaken. The paper also concludes that the University of North London would probably have benefitted from being included in the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise.
[1] Mengxiong Liu,et al. Progress in Documentation the Complexities of citation Practice: a Review of citation studies , 1993, J. Documentation.
[2] Charles Oppenheim,et al. Do citations matter? , 1994, J. Inf. Sci..
[3] Blaise Cronin,et al. Profiling the professors , 1989, J. Inf. Sci..
[4] Derek Law,et al. Research Assessment Exercise 1992; , 1994 .