Escaping from Cities during the COVID-19 Crisis: Using Mobile Phone Data to Trace Mobility in Finland

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis resulted in unprecedented changes in the spatial mobility of people across societies due to the restrictions imposed This also resulted in unexpected mobility and population dynamics that created a challenge for crisis preparedness, including the mobility from cities during the crisis due to the underlying phenomenon of multi-local living People changing their residences can spread the virus between regions and create situations in which health and emergency services are not prepared for the population increase Here, our focus is on urban–rural mobility and the influence of multi-local living on population dynamics in Finland during the COVID-19 crisis in 2020 Results, based on three mobile phone datasets, showed a significant drop in inter-municipal mobility and a shift in the presence of people—a population decline in urban centres and an increase in rural areas, which is strongly correlated to secondary housing This study highlights the need to improve crisis preparedness by: (1) acknowledging the growing importance of multi-local living, and (2) improving the use of novel data sources for monitoring population dynamics and mobility Mobile phone data products have enormous potential, but attention should be paid to the varying methodologies and their possible impact on analysis

[1]  O. Järv,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 on daily lives of transnational people based on smartphone data: Estonians in Finland , 2021, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[2]  Xiao Huang,et al.  Twitter reveals human mobility dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, PloS one.

[3]  Caroline O Buckee,et al.  The use of mobile phone data to inform analysis of COVID-19 pandemic epidemiology , 2020, Nature Communications.

[4]  Dario Tarchi,et al.  Measuring the impact of COVID-19 confinement measures on human mobility using mobile positioning data. A European regional analysis , 2020, Safety Science.

[5]  R. Carlitz,et al.  Life under lockdown: Illustrating tradeoffs in South Africa’s response to COVID-19 , 2020, World Development.

[6]  A. Tatem,et al.  The duration of travel impacts the spatial dynamics of infectious diseases , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Country-wide Mobility Changes Observed Using Mobile Phone Data During COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[8]  Olle Järv,et al.  Tracing human mobilities through mobile phones , 2020 .

[9]  Qingquan Li,et al.  Effects of human mobility restrictions on the spread of COVID-19 in Shenzhen, China: a modelling study using mobile phone data , 2020, The Lancet Digital Health.

[10]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Anonymised and aggregated crowd level mobility data from mobile phones suggests that initial compliance with COVID-19 social distancing interventions was high and geographically consistent across the UK , 2020, Wellcome open research.

[11]  P. Bajardi,et al.  COVID-19 outbreak response, a dataset to assess mobility changes in Italy following national lockdown , 2020, Scientific Data.

[12]  J. Shaman,et al.  Differential COVID-19 case positivity in New York City neighborhoods: socioeconomic factors and mobility , 2020, medRxiv.

[13]  O. Järv,et al.  COVID-19 is spatial: Ensuring that mobile Big Data is used for social good , 2020, Big data & society.

[14]  E. Glaeser,et al.  How Much Does Covid-19 Increase with Mobility? Evidence from New York and Four Other U.S. Cities , 2020 .

[15]  N. Fujiwara,et al.  Non-compulsory measures sufficiently reduced human mobility in Tokyo during the COVID-19 epidemic , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Rubén Cordera,et al.  Effects of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Urban Mobility: Empirical Evidence from the City of Santander (Spain) , 2020, Sustainability.

[17]  Jianmin Jia,et al.  Population flow drives spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 in China , 2020, Nature.

[18]  Marco De Nadai,et al.  Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle , 2020, Science Advances.

[19]  Jessica T Davis,et al.  The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak , 2020, Science.

[20]  W. Clark,et al.  Multiple home ownership in Chinese cities: An institutional and cultural perspective , 2020 .

[21]  Meaghan Stiman Second homes in the city and the country: a reappraisal of vacation homes in the twenty-first century , 2020, International Journal of Housing Policy.

[22]  J. Doling,et al.  Secondary property ownership in Europe: contributing to asset-based welfare strategies and the ‘really big trade-off’ , 2020, International Journal of Housing Policy.

[23]  Rein Ahas,et al.  Dynamic cities: Location-based accessibility modelling as a function of time , 2018, Applied Geography.

[24]  D. de Walque,et al.  Love the Job... Or the Patient? Task vs. Mission-Based Motivations in Healthcare , 2017, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[25]  Olli Lehtonen,et al.  Seasonal residence and counterurbanization: the role of second homes in population redistribution in Finland , 2017 .

[26]  Olle Järv,et al.  Enhancing spatial accuracy of mobile phone data using multi-temporal dasymetric interpolation , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Joseph Ferreira,et al.  Activity-Based Human Mobility Patterns Inferred from Mobile Phone Data: A Case Study of Singapore , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[28]  Andreas Back,et al.  Mapping an invisible population: the uneven geography of second-home tourism , 2017 .

[29]  Yee Leung,et al.  Applying mobile phone data to travel behaviour research: A literature review , 2017 .

[30]  Marianna Brunetti,et al.  Second homes in Italy: every household’s dream or (un)profitable investments? , 2017 .

[31]  Caroline O Buckee,et al.  Connecting Mobility to Infectious Diseases: The Promise and Limits of Mobile Phone Data. , 2016, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[32]  Jonathan Cinnamon,et al.  Evidence and future potential of mobile phone data for disease disaster management , 2016, Geoforum.

[33]  Carolien Beckx,et al.  Dynamic assessment of exposure to air pollution using mobile phone data , 2016, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[34]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Ethnic differences in activity spaces as a characteristic of segregation: A study based on mobile phone usage in Tallinn, Estonia , 2015 .

[35]  Helmut Schad,et al.  Residential Multi-Locality Studies – The Added Value for Research on Families and Second Homes , 2015 .

[36]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Jeffrey D. Kubik,et al.  When Real Estate is the Only Game in Town , 2014 .

[38]  Rein Ahas,et al.  Application of mobile phone location data in mapping of commuting patterns and functional regionalization: a pilot study of Estonia , 2013 .

[39]  R. Ahas,et al.  The Seasonal Variability of Population in Estonian Municipalities , 2010 .

[40]  D. Müller Second Homes in the Nordic Countries: Between Common Heritage and Exclusive Commodity , 2007 .

[41]  D. Steel,et al.  Using Census Data to Investigate the Causes of the Ecological Fallacy , 1998, Environment & planning A.

[42]  Sven Kesselring,et al.  Handbook of Research Methods and Applications for Mobilities , 2020 .

[43]  O. Järv,et al.  Understanding monthly variability in human activity spaces: A twelve-month study using mobile phone call detail records , 2014 .

[44]  R M Prothero,et al.  Disease and mobility: a neglected factor in epidemiology. , 1977, International journal of epidemiology.

[45]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .