Understanding wheel dynamics

[1]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Understanding natural dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Understanding collision dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M K Kaiser,et al.  Observers’ sensitivity to dynamic anomalies in collisions , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Development of Intuitive Theories of Motion: Curvilinear Motion in the Absence of External Forces. , 1986 .

[5]  J. Jonides,et al.  Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[6]  M. McCloskey,et al.  The development of beliefs about falling objects , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Intuitive physics: the straight-down belief and its origin. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  J. Dauben.  Georg Cantor and the Origins of Transfinite Set Theory , 1983 .

[10]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  D. Proffitt,et al.  The roles of contour and luminance distribution in determining perceived centers within shapes , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J. Lowell,et al.  The stability of bicycles , 1982 .

[13]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[14]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[15]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects , 1981, Cognition.

[16]  J. Cutting,et al.  Gait Perception as an Example of How We May Perceive Events , 1981 .

[17]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[18]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics , 1980 .

[19]  James E Cutting,et al.  An Invariant for Wheel-Generated Motions and the Logic of its Determination , 1980, Perception.

[20]  D. Kirshner.  Some nonexplanations of bicycle stability , 1980 .

[21]  J. Cutting,et al.  Perception of wheel-generated motions. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  D. E. Jones.  The stability of the bicycle , 1970 .

[23]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.