Noise evaluation of Compton camera imaging for proton therapy

Compton Cameras emerged as an alternative for real-time dose monitoring techniques for Particle Therapy (PT), based on the detection of prompt-gammas. As a consequence of the Compton scattering process, the gamma origin point can be restricted onto the surface of a cone (Compton cone). Through image reconstruction techniques, the distribution of the gamma emitters can be estimated, using cone-surfaces backprojections of the Compton cones through the image space, along with more sophisticated statistical methods to improve the image quality. To calculate the Compton cone required for image reconstruction, either two interactions, the last being photoelectric absorption, or three scatter interactions are needed. Because of the high energy of the photons in PT the first option might not be adequate, as the photon is not absorbed in general. However, the second option is less efficient. That is the reason to resort to spectral reconstructions, where the incoming γ energy is considered as a variable in the reconstruction inverse problem. Jointly with prompt gamma, secondary neutrons and scattered photons, not strongly correlated with the dose map, can also reach the imaging detector and produce false events. These events deteriorate the image quality. Also, high intensity beams can produce particle accumulation in the camera, which lead to an increase of random coincidences, meaning events which gather measurements from different incoming particles. The noise scenario is expected to be different if double or triple events are used, and consequently, the reconstructed images can be affected differently by spurious data. The aim of the present work is to study the effect of false events in the reconstructed image, evaluating their impact in the determination of the beam particle ranges. A simulation study that includes misidentified events (neutrons and random coincidences) in the final image of a Compton Telescope for PT monitoring is presented. The complete chain of detection, from the beam particle entering a phantom to the event classification, is simulated using FLUKA. The range determination is later estimated from the reconstructed image obtained from a two and three-event algorithm based on Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization. The neutron background and random coincidences due to a therapeutic-like time structure are analyzed for mono-energetic proton beams. The time structure of the beam is included in the simulations, which will affect the rate of particles entering the detector.

[1]  Freek Beekman,et al.  Real-time prompt gamma monitoring in spot-scanning proton therapy using imaging through a knife-edge-shaped slit , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Michael Fenech,et al.  Mitigating the risk of radiation-induced cancers: limitations and paradigms in drug development , 2014, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[3]  William A. Wulf,et al.  Three-Compton telescope: theory, simulations, and performance , 2001 .

[4]  Joao Seco,et al.  Proton range verification through prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  D Dauvergne,et al.  Design Guidelines for a Double Scattering Compton Camera for Prompt-$\gamma$ Imaging During Ion Beam Therapy: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  First Compton telescope prototype based on continuous LaBr3-SiPM detectors , 2013 .

[7]  Chan Hyeong Kim,et al.  Resolution recovery reconstruction for a Compton camera , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  C. Lacasta,et al.  A Compton imaging algorithm for on-line monitoring in hadron therapy , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[9]  A. Ferrari,et al.  FLUKA: A Multi-Particle Transport Code , 2005 .

[10]  F. Beekman,et al.  LaBr3:Ce and SiPMs for time-of-flight PET: achieving 100 ps coincidence resolving time , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Denis Dauvergne,et al.  New methods of real-time control imaging for ion therapy , 2009 .

[12]  H. Paganetti Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  K Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET monitoring of mono-energetic 16O and 12C beams: experiments and FLUKA simulations for homogeneous targets , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Chan Hyeong Kim,et al.  Prompt gamma measurements for locating the dose falloff region in the proton therapy , 2006 .

[16]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Gabriela Llosa,et al.  Development of a three layer Compton telescope prototype based on continuous LaBr3 crystals and Silicon Photomultipliers , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[18]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  A Compton imager for in-vivo dosimetry of proton beams—A design study , 2011 .

[19]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Time-of-flight neutron rejection to improve prompt gamma imaging for proton range verification: a simulation study , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Performance assessment of pixelated LaBr/sub 3/ detector modules for time-of-flight PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[21]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  Optimizing secondary radiation imaging systems for range verification in hadron therapy , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[22]  V. Vlachoudis,et al.  The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications , 2014 .

[23]  Sam Beddar,et al.  Evaluation of a stochastic reconstruction algorithm for use in Compton camera imaging and beam range verification from secondary gamma emission during proton therapy , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Range assessment in particle therapy based on prompt γ-ray timing measurements , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Antony Lomax,et al.  In vivo proton range verification: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  A. Del Guerra,et al.  A PET Prototype for “In-Beam” Monitoring of Proton Therapy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[27]  Byung-Hwi Kang,et al.  Monte Carlo Design Study of a Gamma Detector System to Locate Distal Dose Falloff in Proton Therapy , 2009 .

[28]  Zhong He,et al.  Gamma-ray energy-imaging integrated spectral deconvolution , 2007 .

[29]  H Paganetti,et al.  Monte Carlo patient study on the comparison of prompt gamma and PET imaging for range verification in proton therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Joao Seco,et al.  Energy- and time-resolved detection of prompt gamma-rays for proton range verification , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  M. Bajard,et al.  Monitoring the Bragg peak location of 73 MeV/u carbon ions by means of prompt γ-ray measurements , 2008, 0809.0185.

[32]  Katia Parodi,et al.  In-beam PET measurements of β+ radioactivity induced by proton beams , 2002 .

[33]  Sam Beddar,et al.  Material efficiency studies for a Compton camera designed to measure characteristic prompt gamma rays emitted during proton beam radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Chan Hyeong Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo study of a double-scattering Compton camera with GEANT4 , 2007 .

[35]  D Robertson,et al.  Optimizing a three-stage Compton camera for measuring prompt gamma rays emitted during proton radiotherapy , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.