Spatial Scan Statistics Adjusted for Multiple Clusters

The spatial scan statistic is one of the main epidemiological tools to test for the presence of disease clusters in a geographical region. While the statistical significance of the most likely cluster is correctly assessed using the model assumptions, secondary clusters tend to have conservatively high P-values. In this paper, we propose a sequential version of the spatial scan statistic to adjust for the presence of other clusters in the study region. The procedure removes the effect due to the more likely clusters on less significant clusters by sequential deletion of the previously detected clusters. Using the Northeastern United States geography and population in a simulation study, we calculated the type I error probability and the power of this sequential test under different alternative models concerning the locations and sizes of the true clusters. The results show that the type I error probability of our method is close to the nominal level and that for secondary clusters its power is higher than the standard unadjusted scan statistic.

[1]  M. Dwass.  Modified Randomization Tests for Nonparametric Hypotheses , 1957 .

[2]  M. Kulldorff,et al.  Breast cancer clusters in the northeast United States: a geographic analysis. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Martin Kulldorff,et al.  Prospective time periodic geographical disease surveillance using a scan statistic , 2001 .

[4]  Peter J. Park,et al.  Power comparisons for disease clustering tests , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[5]  G. P. Patil,et al.  Upper level set scan statistic for detecting arbitrarily shaped hotspots , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[6]  Holly Jacobson,et al.  Evaluating the disparity of female breast cancer mortality among racial groups - a spatiotemporal analysis , 2004, International journal of health geographics.

[7]  S. Martin,et al.  Investigation of clusters of giardiasis using GIS and a spatial scan statistic , 2004, International journal of health geographics.

[8]  Simonne Almeida e Silva,et al.  Population-based surveillance of pediatric pneumonia: use of spatial analysis in an urban area of Central Brazil. , 2004, Cadernos de saude publica.

[9]  M. Kulldorff,et al.  Syndromic surveillance in public health practice, New York City. , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[10]  Michael J Beach,et al.  Spatial clustering of filarial transmission before and after a Mass Drug Administration in a setting of low infection prevalence , 2004, Filaria journal.

[11]  Renato Assunção,et al.  A Simulated Annealing Strategy for the Detection of Arbitrarily Shaped Spatial Clusters , 2022 .

[12]  T. Tango,et al.  International Journal of Health Geographics a Flexibly Shaped Spatial Scan Statistic for Detecting Clusters , 2005 .

[13]  M. Kulldorff,et al.  A Space–Time Permutation Scan Statistic for Disease Outbreak Detection , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[14]  R. Assunção,et al.  Fast detection of arbitrarily shaped disease clusters , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Spatial scan statistics using elliptic windows , 2006 .

[16]  Martin Kulldorff,et al.  A Spatial Scan Statistic for Survival Data , 2007, Biometrics.

[17]  Christian Sonesson,et al.  A CUSUM framework for detection of space–time disease clusters using scan statistics , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  Benjamin Kedem,et al.  A semiparametric cluster detection method — a comprehensive power comparison with Kulldorff's method , 2009, International journal of health geographics.