Point Clouds: Lidar versus 3D Vision

Novel automated photogrammetry is based on four innovations. First is the cost-free increase of overlap between images when sensing digitally. Second is an improved radiometry. Third is multi-view matching. Fourth is the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), making complex algorithms for image matching very practical. These innovations lead to improved automation of the photogrammetric workflow so that point clouds are created at sub-pixel accuracy, at very dense intervals, and in near real-time, thereby eroding the unique selling proposition of lidar scanners. Two test projects compare point clouds from aerial and street-side lidar systems with those created from images. We show that the photogrammetric accuracy compares well with the lidar-method, yet the density of surface points is much higher from images, and the throughput is commensurate with a fully automated all-digital approach. Beyond this density, we identify 15 additional advantages of the photogrammetric approach.

[1]  Michal Irani,et al.  Super resolution from image sequences , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[2]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[4]  Wolfgang Schickler,et al.  SURFACE ESTIMATION BASED ON LIDAR , 2001 .

[5]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[6]  Reginald R. Souleyrette,et al.  COMPARISON OF LIDAR AND CONVENTIONAL MAPPING METHODS FOR HIGHWAY CORRIDOR STUDIES , 2002 .

[7]  D Veneziano.  ACCURACY EVALUATION OF LIDAR-DERIVED TERRAIN DATA FOR HIGHWAY LOCATION , 2002 .

[8]  Roland Perko,et al.  QUALITY COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND FILM-BASED IMAGES FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PURPOSES , 2004 .

[9]  G. Bitelli,et al.  TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING AND DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY TECHNIQUES TO MONITOR LANDSLIDE BODIES , 2004 .

[10]  Ayman Habib,et al.  LIDAR Data for Photogrammetric Georeferencing , 2005 .

[11]  George Vosselman,et al.  Accuracy of 3D city models: EuroSDR comparison , 2005 .

[12]  E. Mikhail,et al.  Manual of Photogrammetry, 5th Edition , 2006 .

[13]  Lukas Zebedin,et al.  Towards 3D map generation from digital aerial images , 2006 .

[14]  Michael Gruber,et al.  Geometric issues of the digital large format aerial camera UltraCamD , 2006 .

[15]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Towards Wiki-based Dense City Modeling , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[16]  Tomás Pajdla,et al.  Robust Rotation and Translation Estimation in Multiview Reconstruction , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  G. Hunter,et al.  Performance of the StreetMapper Mobile LIDAR Mapping System in “ Real World ” Projects , 2007 .

[18]  Horst Bischof,et al.  A Globally Optimal Algorithm for Robust TV-L1 Range Image Integration , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[19]  Richard Ladstädtera,et al.  GEOMETRIC ASPECTS CONCERNING THE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC WORKFLOW OF THE DIGITAL AERIAL CAMERA ULTRACAMX , 2008 .

[20]  Bernhard Reitinger,et al.  ULTRACAMX AND A NEW WAY OF PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PROCESSING , 2008 .

[21]  Pascal Fua,et al.  On benchmarking camera calibration and multi-view stereo for high resolution imagery , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  S. Schneider.  RADIOMETRIC QUALITY OF ULTRACAM-X IMAGES , 2008 .

[23]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  A TEST OF AUTOMATIC BUILDING CHANGE DETECTION APPROACHES , 2009 .

[24]  Gerhard Paar,et al.  Window Detection from Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data - A Statistical Approach , 2009, VISAPP.

[25]  Norbert Haala,et al.  Digitale photogrammetrische Luftbildkamerasysteme - Eva- luation der automatischen Generierung von Höhenmodellen , 2009 .

[26]  W. Cao,et al.  The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVIII-4/C7 CLASSIFICATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION OPTICAL AND SAR FUSION IMAGE USING FUZZY KNOWLEDGE AND OBJECT-ORIENTED PARADIGM , 2010 .

[27]  Norbert Haala,et al.  DGPF Project: Evaluation of Digital Photogrammetric Aerial-based Imaging Systems - Overview and Results from the Pilot Center , 2010 .