PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Mate Selection Preferences : Gender Differences Examined in a National Sample

Social psychologists have devoted considerable theoretical and empirical attention to studying gender differences in traits desired in a mate. Most of the studies on mate preferences, however, have been conducted with small, nonrepresentative samples. In this study, we analyzed data collected from single adults in a national probability sample, the National Survey of Families and Households. Respondents were asked to consider 12 possible assets or liabilities in a marriage partner and to indicate their willingness to marry someone possessing each of these traits. These data extended previous research by comparing men's and women's mate preferences in a heterogeneous sample of the national population and by comparing gender differences in different sociodemographic groups. The gender differences found in this study were consistent with those secured in previous research (e.g., youth and physical attractiveness were found to be more important for men than for women; earning potential was found to be less important for men than for women) and were quite consistent across age groups and races. However, the various sociodemographic groups differed slightly in the magnitude of gender differences for some of the mate preferences.

[1]  M. Trost,et al.  A reproductive exchange model of heterosexual relationships: Putting proximate economics in ultimate perspective. , 1989 .

[2]  B. I. Murstein Paths to marriage , 1986 .

[3]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[4]  M. Cunningham Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[5]  Stanley B. Woll So Many to Choose from: Decision Strategies in Videodating , 1986 .

[6]  A. Harrison,et al.  Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. , 1977 .

[7]  N. Glenn,et al.  The Utility of Education and Attractiveness for Females' Status Attainment Through Marriage. , 1976 .

[8]  Rosemary Bolig,et al.  The Self-Advertisement Approach to Dating: Male-Female Differences. , 1984 .

[9]  G. Elder Appearance and education in marriage mobility. , 1969, American sociological review.

[10]  J. Udry,et al.  Benefits of Being Attractive: Differential Payoffs for Men and Women , 1984 .

[11]  P. Blumstein,et al.  Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. , 1987 .

[12]  L. Bumpass,et al.  The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households. , 1988 .

[13]  M. Wiederman,et al.  Love and mate selection in the 1990s , 1991 .

[14]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[15]  K. Deaux,et al.  Courtship in the personals column: The influence of gender and sexual orientation , 1984 .

[16]  J. Prather It's Just as Easy to Marry a Rich Man as a Poor One! Students' Accounts of Parental Messages About Marital Partners , 1990 .

[17]  D. Buss,et al.  Preferences in human mate selection. , 1986 .

[18]  K. Bulcroft,et al.  Race Differences in Attitudinal and Motivational Factors in the Decision to Marry. , 1993 .

[19]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  G. Spanier,et al.  Mate Selection Differentials Between Whites and Blacks in the United States , 1980 .

[21]  J. Townsend,et al.  Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection , 1990, Archives of sexual behavior.

[22]  Successful Personal Ads: Gender Differences and Similarities in Offers, Stipulations, and Outcomes , 1991 .

[23]  S. South,et al.  Sociodemographic Differentials in Mate Selection Preferences. , 1991 .

[24]  S. Oskamp,et al.  Courtship American Style: Newspaper Ads* , 1977 .

[25]  J. Hudson,et al.  Campus Values in Mate Selection: A Replication. , 1969 .

[26]  Susan Sprecher,et al.  The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction , 1989 .

[27]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Self-Presentation in Personal Advertisements: The Influence of Implicit Notions of Attraction and Role Expectations , 1988 .

[28]  R. Goodwin Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar? , 1990 .

[29]  J. Townsend,et al.  Mate selection criteria. A pilot study , 1989 .

[30]  J. Udry The Importance of Being Beautiful: A Reexamination and Racial Comparison , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  M. Wiederman,et al.  Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation?☆ , 1992 .

[32]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. , 1990 .

[33]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.