Contingency constrained economic load dispatch using improved particle swarm optimization for security enhancement

This paper presents a contingency constrained economic load dispatch (CCELD) using proposed improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO), conventional particle swarm optimization (PSO), evolutionary programming (EP) techniques such as classical EP (CEP), fast-EP (FEP) and mean of classical and fast EP (MFEP) to alleviate line overloading. Power system security enhancement deals with the task of taking remedial action against possible network overloads in the system following the occurrences of contingencies. Line overload can be removed by means of generation redispatching. In the proposed improved PSO, a new velocity strategy equation with scaling factor is proposed and the constriction factor approach (CFA) utilizes the eigen value analysis and controls the system behaviour. The CCELD problem is a twin objective function viz. minimization of fuel cost and minimization of severity index. This proposed IPSO-based CCELD approach generates higher quality solution in terms of optimal cost, minimum CPU time and minimum severity index than the other methods. Simulation results on IEEE-118 bus and IEEE-30 bus test systems are presented and compared with the results of other approaches.

[1]  D. Thukaram,et al.  A fuzzy control for network overload alleviation , 2001 .

[2]  B. Yegnanarayana,et al.  Genetic-algorithm-based optimal power flow for security enhancement , 2005 .

[3]  Rich Christie,et al.  IEEE 118-Bus System , 1962 .

[4]  B. Stott,et al.  Further developments in LP-based optimal power flow , 1990 .

[5]  K.S. Swarup,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for security constrained economic dispatch , 2004, International Conference on Intelligent Sensing and Information Processing, 2004. Proceedings of.

[6]  Zwe-Lee Gaing,et al.  Particle swarm optimization to solving the economic dispatch considering the generator constraints , 2003 .

[7]  P. K. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Evolutionary programming techniques for economic load dispatch , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[8]  Narayana Prasad Padhy,et al.  Comparison and application of evolutionary programming techniques to combined economic emission dispatch with line flow constraints , 2003 .

[9]  J. A. Momoh,et al.  Power System Security Enhancement by OPF with Phase Shifter , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[10]  Ivana Kockar,et al.  Phase shifter placement in large-scale systems via mixed integer linear programming , 2003 .

[11]  P. Somasundaram,et al.  Application of evolutionary programming to security constrained economic dispatch , 2005 .

[12]  R. Eberhart,et al.  Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[13]  Kwang Y. Lee,et al.  Optimal Real and Reactive Power Control Using Linear Programming , 1993 .

[14]  W. R. Lachs Transmission-line overloads: real-time control , 1987 .

[15]  R. Billinton,et al.  Generation Rescheduling and Load Shedding to Alleviate Line Overloads-Analysis , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[16]  A. Monticelli,et al.  Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Post-Contingency Corrective Rescheduling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Hadi Saadat,et al.  Power System Analysis , 1998 .

[18]  Kwang Y. Lee,et al.  Fuel-cost minimisation for both real-and reactive-power dispatches , 1984 .