The diastolic flow-pressure gradient relation in coronary stenoses in humans.

[1]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  K. Gould,et al.  Pressure‐Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenoses in Unsedated Dogs at Rest and during Coronary Vasodilation , 1978, Circulation research.

[3]  K. Gallagher,et al.  The diastolic hyperemic flow versus pressure relation. A new index of coronary stenosis severity and flow reserve. , 1989, Circulation.

[4]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  F J Pinto,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: an in vivo comparison with quantitative angiography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[7]  P. Serruys,et al.  Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity with sensor-tip guidewires: a new methodologic approach for assessment of coronary hemodynamics before and after coronary interventions. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Erbel,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in vivo. , 1994, British heart journal.

[9]  P. Serruys,et al.  Slope of the Instantaneous Hyperemic Diastolic Coronary Flow Velocit‐Pressure Relation: A New Index for Assessment of the Physiological Significance of Coronary Stenosis in mans , 1994, Circulation.

[10]  F Alfonso,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary segments in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1994, American heart journal.

[11]  M. Kern,et al.  Comparison of quantitative angiographically derived and measured translesion pressure and flow velocity in coronary artery disease. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[13]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve , 1995 .

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Utilization of translesional hemodynamics: comparison of pressure and flow methods in stenosis assessment in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1996, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[15]  W. Wijns,et al.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. , 1996, Circulation.

[16]  H. Yamada,et al.  Estimation of coronary flow reserve with the instantaneous coronary flow velocity versus pressure relation: a new index of coronary flow reserve independent of perfusion pressure. , 1996, American heart journal.

[17]  L. Deckelbaum,et al.  Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group. , 1997, Circulation.

[18]  M. Kern,et al.  Coronary physiology revisited : practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 2000, Circulation.

[19]  M. Kern.  Curriculum in interventional cardiology: Coronary pressure and flow measurements in the cardiac catheterization laboratory , 2001, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.