CATA vs. FCP for a rapid descriptive analysis in sensory characterization of fish

[1]  Michelle K. Beresford,et al.  Comparison of sensory product profiles generated by trained assessors and consumers using CATA questions: Four case studies with complex and/or similar samples , 2015 .

[2]  Da-Wen Sun,et al.  Texture and Structure Measurements and Analyses for Evaluation of Fish and Fillet Freshness Quality: A Review. , 2014, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[3]  Caroline Marques,et al.  Flash Profile as an effective method for assessment of odor profile in three different fishes , 2019, Journal of Food Science and Technology.

[4]  M. Matsushita,et al.  Sensory characterization of Nile tilapia croquettes enriched with flaxseed flour using free‐choice profiling and common components and specific weights analysis , 2018 .

[5]  Jing Liu,et al.  Comparison of rapid descriptive sensory methodologies: Free-Choice Profiling, Flash Profile and modified Flash Profile. , 2018, Food research international.

[6]  Luis Guerrero,et al.  A Comparison of Two Methods for Generating Descriptive Attributes with Trained Assessors: Check‐All‐That‐Apply (CATA) vs. Free Choice Profiling (FCP) , 2016 .

[7]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1999 .

[8]  D. V. Byrne,et al.  Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) with semi-trained assessors: sensory profiles closer to descriptive analysis or consumer elicited data? , 2018 .

[9]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Comparison of two sensory profiling techniques based on consumer perception , 2010 .

[10]  G. Ares,et al.  Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions with consumers in practice: experimental considerations and impact on outcome , 2015 .

[11]  E. Martinsdóttir,et al.  Development of Quality Index Method (QIM) scheme for fresh cod (Gadus morhua) fillets and application in shelf life study , 2007 .

[12]  Pieter H. Punter,et al.  Free Choice Profiling , 2018 .

[13]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Identifying ideal products using three different consumer profiling methodologies. Comparison with external preference mapping , 2011 .

[14]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization , 2012 .

[15]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2003, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[16]  Lauro Melo,et al.  Discrimination of sensory attributes by trained assessors and consumers in semi-sweet hard dough biscuits and their drivers of liking and disliking. , 2019, Food research international.

[17]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  How reliable are the consumers? Comparison of sensory profiles from consumers and experts , 2010 .

[18]  A. Cardello,et al.  Consumer Evaluation of the Sensory Properties of Fish , 1988 .

[19]  F. Shahidi,et al.  Value-added products from underutilized fish species. , 1995, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[20]  Miguelina Guirao,et al.  PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN TRAINED ASSESSORS AND WINE EXPERTS USING SPECIFIC SENSORY ATTRIBUTES , 2004 .

[21]  J. Mocák,et al.  Effect of animal age and gender on fatty acid and elemental composition in Austrian beef applicable for authentication purposes , 2013, Chemical Papers.

[22]  M. Mitterer‐Daltoé,et al.  Check all that apply (CATA) as an instrument for the development of fish products , 2016 .

[23]  Amaya Franco-Uría,et al.  Valorisation of fish by-products against waste management treatments--Comparison of environmental impacts. , 2015, Waste management.

[24]  Erick A Esmerino,et al.  Consumer-based product characterization using Pivot Profile, Projective Mapping and Check-all-that-apply (CATA): A comparative case with Greek yogurt samples. , 2017, Food research international.

[25]  Conor M. Delahunty,et al.  Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present and future , 2001 .

[26]  G. Ares,et al.  Trained vs. consumer panels for analytical testing: Fueling a long lasting debate in the field , 2017 .

[27]  Hildegarde Heymann,et al.  A summary of projective mapping observations – The effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements , 2013 .

[28]  John C. Castura,et al.  Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data , 2013 .