Identification of Research Areas to Advance the Adoption of Cross-Laminated Timber in North America

Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) is emerging as a promising building system that could help revitalize a dwindling forest sector. However, little research has been conducted about CLT, particularly in the marketing realm. Our paper helps bridge this gap. Specifically, we aim to identify research areas that are important to successfully advance CLT as a building material in North America. Our findings, based on a survey of experts, suggest that the level of awareness about CLT among building professionals in general is low. However, architects are considered knowledgeable about the product. Experts consider that the most important barriers to the adoption of CLT are(a) misperceptions held by building industry professionals about wood and CLT, (b) compatibility of building codes with CLT, and (c) the availability of technical information about CLT as a construction system. In terms of most pressing research areas for advancing CLT, experts consider that it is important to shed more light on its seismic and fire performance, and also on proper connectors and fasteners used in CLT-based construction.

[1]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  A project contribution to the development of sustainable multi-storey timber buildings , 2013 .

[2]  Enda Crossin,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a cross laminated timber building , 2013 .

[3]  Pamela L. Alreck,et al.  The Survey Research Handbook , 1984 .

[4]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[5]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  The Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials in the Context of Residential Construction , 2007 .

[6]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Implementation of construction innovations , 2000 .

[7]  Naohito Kawai,et al.  SOFIE project – 3D shaking table test on a seven‐storey full‐scale cross‐laminated timber building , 2013 .

[8]  F. E. Dickinson Forest products laboratory , 1979 .

[9]  Richard A. Parker,et al.  Designing and conducting survey research , 2016 .

[10]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Five Dimensions of the Industrial Adoption Process , 1971 .

[11]  Angela P. Wetzel Internet, mail, and mixed‐mode surveys: The tailored design method , 2010 .

[12]  Omar A Espinoza,et al.  Outlook for Cross-Laminated Timber in the United States , 2014 .

[13]  Scott A. Bowe,et al.  A GATE-TO-GATE LIFE-CYCLE INVENTORY OF SOLID HARDWOOD FLOORING IN THE EASTERN US , 2010 .

[14]  Richard A. Parker,et al.  Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide , 1992 .

[15]  Thomas Fruergaard Astrup,et al.  Wood Science and Engineering , 2004 .

[16]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Project Management for Construction: Fundamental Concepts for Owners, Engineers, Architects, and Builders , 1989 .

[17]  S. John,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Different Construction Materials , 2009 .

[18]  Frank Lam,et al.  A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Mid-Rise Office Building Construction Alternatives: Laminated Timber or Reinforced Concrete , 2012 .

[19]  J. W. Harvey Evaluative Conflict and Information Search %N the Adoption Process , 1979 .

[20]  Maria Fernanda,et al.  Awareness, Perceptions and Willingness to Adopt Cross-Laminated Timber in the United States , 2014 .

[21]  Adam Blake Robertson,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of mid-rise office building construction alternatives : laminated timber or reinforced concrete , 2011 .

[22]  Robert J. Ross,et al.  Wood handbook : wood as an engineering material , 2010 .

[23]  Rosalind Masterson,et al.  Marketing : An Introduction , 2004 .

[24]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  CORRIM: Life-Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials , 2004 .

[25]  Eric Hansen,et al.  Innovation in large versus small companies: insights from the US wood products industry , 2005 .

[26]  Urs Buehlmann,et al.  Cross-laminated timber: Status and research needs in Europe , 2015 .

[27]  Walid Y. Thabet,et al.  Understanding the role of developer/builders in the concurrent commercialization of product innovation , 2009 .