Latent resilience in ponderosa pine forest: effects of resumed frequent fire.

Ecological systems often exhibit resilient states that are maintained through negative feedbacks. In ponderosa pine forests, fire historically represented the negative feedback mechanism that maintained ecosystem resilience; fire exclusion reduced that resilience, predisposing the transition to an alternative ecosystem state upon reintroduction of fire. We evaluated the effects of reintroduced frequent wildfire in unlogged, fire-excluded, ponderosa pine forest in the Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana, USA. Initial reintroduction of fire in 2003 reduced tree density and consumed surface fuels, but also stimulated establishment of a dense cohort of lodgepole pine, maintaining a trajectory toward an alternative state. Resumption of a frequent fire regime by a second fire in 2011 restored a low-density forest dominated by large-diameter ponderosa pine by eliminating many regenerating lodgepole pines and by continuing to remove surface fuels and small-diameter lodgepole pine and Douglas-fir that established during the fire suppression era. Our data demonstrate that some unlogged, fire-excluded, ponderosa pine forests possess latent resilience to reintroduced fire. A passive model of simply allowing lightning-ignited fires to burn appears to be a viable approach to restoration of such forests.

[1]  Margaret M. Moore,et al.  Southwestern Ponderosa Forest Structure: Changes Since Euro-American Settlement , 1994, Journal of Forestry.

[2]  A. Taylor.  Fire disturbance and forest structure in an old-growth Pinus ponderosa forest, southern Cascades, USA , 2010 .

[3]  R. Keane,et al.  Mixed-severity fire regimes in the northern Rocky Mountains: consequences of fire exclusion and options for the future , 2000 .

[4]  P. Hessburg,et al.  Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras , 2005 .

[5]  J. Lunan,et al.  The Effects of Fire Exclusion on Ponderosa Pine Communities in Glacier National Park, Montana , 1973 .

[6]  Joy Nystrom Mast,et al.  How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires , 2005 .

[7]  D. Haydon,et al.  Alternative stable states in ecology , 2003 .

[8]  M. Rollins,et al.  Effects of Multiple Wildland Fires on Ponderosa Pine Stand Structure in Two Southwestern Wilderness Areas, USA , 2007 .

[9]  S. Arno,et al.  Fire regimes of western larch – lodgepole pine forests in Glacier National Park, Montana , 1991 .

[10]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Forest fire management, climate change and the risk of catastrophic carbon losses , 2013 .

[11]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  The photoload sampling technique: estimating surface fuel loadings from downward-looking photographs of synthetic fuelbeds , 2007 .

[12]  R. Keane,et al.  The Complexity of Managing Fire-dependent Ecosystems in Wilderness: Relict Ponderosa Pine in the Bob Marshall Wilderness , 2006, Ecological Restoration.

[13]  F. Chapin,et al.  Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology , 2002, Springer New York.

[14]  Joe H. Scott,et al.  Age-class structure of old growth ponderosa pine/douglas-fir stands and its relationship to fire history. Forest Service research paper , 1995 .

[15]  Topographic Variation in Structure of Mixed-Conifer Forests Under an Active-Fire Regime , 2012, Ecosystems.

[16]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Using Fire to Increase the Scale, Benefits, and Future Maintenance of Fuels Treatments , 2012 .

[17]  E. Keeling,et al.  Interactive effects of historical logging and fire exclusion on ponderosa pine forest structure in the northern Rockies. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  W. Baker,et al.  Spatially extensive reconstructions show variable‐severity fire and heterogeneous structure in historical western United States dry forests , 2012 .