E-portfolio Development Through Activity Theory in Action Research

This paper illustrates the value of using activity theory with action research to examine the development of an e-portfolio system used in an engineering-based Malaysian university. Engestrom’s third generation activity theory, situated within socio-cultural theory, can be used to analyse the development of the e-portfolio system. The theory provides a tool to analyse how individual or groups use mediating artefacts (e-portfolio) to achieve a specific object and outcome. It also provides a framework to analyse socio cultural influences of rules and norms, community and division of labour in the same activity system. It is our belief that Activity theory (AT) can be used in conjunction with action research. Whilst such view can be considered as controversial, this paper illustrates the value of using activity theory with action research.

[1]  Monica B. Behrend Engeström’s activity theory as a tool to analyse online resources embedding academic literacies , 2014 .

[2]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Articulating User Needs in Collaborative Design: Towards an Activity-Theoretical Approach , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[3]  Jeff Haywood,et al.  Engagement with Electronic Portfolios: Challenges from the Student Perspective , 2005 .

[4]  Trent Batson The Electronic Portfolio Boom: What's It All About?. , 2002 .

[5]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[6]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Information seeking and subject representation: An activity‐theoretical approach to information science , 1998 .

[7]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[8]  Y. Engeström,et al.  New Forms of Learning in Co-Configuration Work. , 2004 .

[9]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and Action Research , 2011 .

[10]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[11]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Information retrieval, text composition, and semantics , 1998 .

[12]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[13]  Jean McNiff,et al.  You and your action research project , 1988 .

[14]  Y. Engeström Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[15]  Lily Orland-Barak,et al.  Cycles of Action through Systems of Activity: Examining an Action Research Model through the Lens of Activity Theory , 2011 .

[16]  Mark A. Spasser Informing information science: the case for activity theory , 1999 .

[17]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Individual and collective activities in educational computer game playing , 1997, CSCL.

[18]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  What is to be done? The place of action research , 2010 .

[19]  Gary N. McLean,et al.  Organization development: Principles, process, performance , 2005 .

[20]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .