An evaluative tool for preoperative planning of brain tumor resection

A patient specific finite element biphasic brain model has been utilized to codify a surgeon's experience by establishing quantifiable biomechanical measures to score orientations for optimal planning of brain tumor resection. When faced with evaluating several potential approaches to tumor removal during preoperative planning, the goal of this work is to facilitate the surgeon's selection of a patient head orientation such that tumor presentation and resection is assisted via favorable brain shift conditions rather than trying to allay confounding ones. Displacement-based measures consisting of area classification of the brain surface shifting in the craniotomy region and lateral displacement of the tumor center relative to an approach vector defined by the surgeon were calculated over a range of orientations and used to form an objective function. The objective function was used in conjunction with Levenberg-Marquardt optimization to find the ideal patient orientation. For a frontal lobe tumor presentation the model predicts an ideal orientation that indicates the patient should be placed in a lateral decubitus position on the side contralateral to the tumor in order to minimize unfavorable brain shift.

[1]  C. Nimsky,et al.  Quantification of, Visualization of, and Compensation for Brain Shift Using Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  In vivo quantification of a homogeneous brain deformation model for updating preoperative images during surgery , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  A Fast and Efficient Method to Compensate for Brain Shift for Tumor Resection Therapies Measured Between Preoperative and Postoperative Tomograms , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Modeling of Retraction and Resection for Intraoperative Updating of Images , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[5]  J. Patrick Intraoperative Brain Shift and Deformation: A Quantitative Analysis of Cortical Displacement in 28 Cases , 1998 .

[6]  S. Rapoport,et al.  A two-dimensional, finite element analysis of vasogenic brain edema. , 1990, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[7]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Model-updated image guidance: initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  K. Paulsen,et al.  A computational model for tracking subsurface tissue deformation during stereotactic neurosurgery , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  An atlas-based method to compensate for brain shift: Preliminary results , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Michael I. Miga,et al.  Modeling surgical procedures to assist in understanding surgical approach , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Updated Neuroimaging Using Intraoperative Brain Modeling and Sparse Data , 2000, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[12]  N. Hata,et al.  Serial Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Shift , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[13]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Initial In-Vivo Analysis of 3d Heterogeneous Brain Computations for Model-Updated Image-Guided Neurosurgery , 1998, MICCAI.

[14]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[15]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Measurement and analysis of brain deformation during neurosurgery , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.