The Potential Role of Direct and Indirect Contacts on Infection Spread in Dairy Farm Networks

Animals’ exchanges are considered the most effective route of between-farm infectious disease transmission. However, despite being often overlooked, the infection spread due to contaminated equipment, vehicles, or personnel proved to be important for several livestock epidemics. This study investigated the role of indirect contacts in a potential infection spread in the dairy farm network of the Province of Parma (Northern Italy). We built between-farm contact networks using data on cattle exchange (direct contacts), and on-farm visits by veterinarians (indirect contacts). We compared the features of the contact structures by using measures on static and temporal networks. We assessed the disease spreading potential of the direct and indirect network structures in the farm system by using data on the infection state of farms by paratuberculosis. Direct and indirect networks showed non-trivial differences with respect to connectivity, contact distribution, and super-spreaders identification. Furthermore, our analyses on paratuberculosis data suggested that the contributions of direct and indirect contacts on diseases spread are apparent at different spatial scales. Our results highlighted the potential role of indirect contacts in between-farm disease spread and underlined the need for a deeper understanding of these contacts to develop better strategies for prevention of livestock epidemics.

[1]  D. Wilson,et al.  Herd-level prevalence of Johne's disease in Utah and adjacent areas of the intermountain west as detected by a bulk-tank milk surveillance project. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  B Dufour,et al.  Network of contacts between cattle herds in a French area affected by bovine tuberculosis in 2010. , 2012, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[3]  D U Pfeiffer,et al.  Within-herd contact structure and transmission of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in a persistently infected dairy cattle herd. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  R. Christley,et al.  Infection in social networks: using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  L. Meyers,et al.  Susceptible–infected–recovered epidemics in dynamic contact networks , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  R. Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Activity driven modeling of time varying networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Ynte H Schukken,et al.  Management factors associated with veterinary usage by organic and conventional dairy farms. , 2013, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[8]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Meggan E Craft,et al.  Network analysis of cattle movements in Uruguay: Quantifying heterogeneity for risk-based disease surveillance and control. , 2016, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[10]  Mirjam Nielen,et al.  Relationship between Presence of Cows with Milk Positive for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis-Specific Antibody by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Viable M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Dust in Cattle Barns , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  A J Graham,et al.  Spatial analysis for epidemiology. , 2004, Acta tropica.

[12]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Optimizing surveillance for livestock disease spreading through animal movements , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  R. Christley,et al.  Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[14]  L Matthews,et al.  Epidemiological implications of the contact network structure for cattle farms and the 20–80 rule , 2005, Biology Letters.

[15]  L García Álvarez,et al.  A novel field-based approach to validate the use of network models for disease spread between dairy herds , 2011, Epidemiology and Infection.

[16]  Elisabeta Vergu,et al.  Characteristics of the spatio-temporal network of cattle movements in France over a 5-year period. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[17]  R W Sweeney,et al.  Transmission of paratuberculosis. , 1994, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[18]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[19]  Rowland R Kao,et al.  The impact of local heterogeneity on alternative control strategies for foot-and-mouth disease , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Rowland R Kao,et al.  Disease dynamics over very different time-scales: foot-and-mouth disease and scrapie on the network of livestock movements in the UK , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  R. May,et al.  Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease , 2003, Nature.

[22]  I. Kiss,et al.  The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Representing the UK's cattle herd as static and dynamic networks , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  G J Gunn,et al.  A model of the relationship between the epidemiology of Johne's disease and the environment in suckler-beef herds. , 2006, Veterinary journal.

[25]  Mark C Thurmond,et al.  Description of an epidemic simulation model for use in evaluating strategies to control an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. , 2003, American journal of veterinary research.

[26]  R W Sweeney,et al.  Paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in cattle and other susceptible species. , 2012, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[27]  Jenny Frössling,et al.  A survey of visitors on Swedish livestock farms with reference to the spread of animal diseases , 2013, BMC Veterinary Research.

[28]  M. Konschake,et al.  On the Robustness of In- and Out-Components in a Temporal Network , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  T E Carpenter,et al.  Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission. , 2001, American journal of veterinary research.

[30]  Luca Bolzoni,et al.  Epidemiological modelling for the assessment of bovine tuberculosis surveillance in the dairy farm network in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). , 2014, Epidemics.

[31]  M Nielen,et al.  Environmental contamination with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis within and around a dairy barn under experimental conditions. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[33]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[34]  Luca Bolzoni,et al.  Estimation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis load in raw bulk tank milk in Emilia‐Romagna Region (Italy) by qPCR , 2016, MicrobiologyOpen.

[35]  A. A. Dijkhuizen,et al.  Quantification of contacts between Dutch farms to assess the potential risk of foot-and-mouth disease spread. , 1996 .

[36]  M. Nöremark,et al.  Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[37]  A. Barrat,et al.  Dynamical Patterns of Cattle Trade Movements , 2011, PloS one.

[38]  M. Treviño,et al.  Noradrenergic ‘Tone’ Determines Dichotomous Control of Cortical Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  The Foot-and-Mouth Epidemic in Great Britain: Pattern of Spread and Impact of Interventions , 2001, Science.

[40]  Lara Savini,et al.  Predicting Epidemic Risk from Past Temporal Contact Data , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  N. Savill,et al.  Potential for transmission of infections in networks of cattle farms. , 2010, Epidemics.

[42]  M. Keeling,et al.  Networks and epidemic models , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[43]  R. Kitching,et al.  Use and abuse of mathematical models: an illustration from the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in the United Kingdom. , 2006, Revue scientifique et technique.

[44]  L. Danon,et al.  Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  D U Pfeiffer,et al.  Invited review: modeling within-herd transmission of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in dairy cattle: a review. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[46]  R S Morris,et al.  The potential extent of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease: a study of the movement of animals and materials in Southland, New Zealand. , 1993, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[47]  R. Whittington,et al.  Progress towards understanding the spread, detection and control of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in animal populations. , 2001, Australian veterinary journal.

[48]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Cattle movements and bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain , 2005, Nature.

[49]  M. Thrusfield,et al.  Destructive tension: mathematics versus experience--the progress and control of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain. , 2011, Revue scientifique et technique.

[50]  Gilles Fecteau,et al.  Genome-Wide Diversity and Phylogeography of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Canadian Dairy Cattle , 2016, PloS one.

[51]  C Dubé,et al.  Comparing network analysis measures to determine potential epidemic size of highly contagious exotic diseases in fragmented monthly networks of dairy cattle movements in Ontario, Canada. , 2008, Transboundary and emerging diseases.

[52]  R L Sanson,et al.  A survey to investigate movements off sheep and cattle farms in New Zealand, with reference to the potential transmission of foot-and-mouth disease , 2005, New Zealand veterinary journal.