Quantitative analysis of four protein biomarkers: An automated microfluidic cartridge-based method and its comparison to colorimetric ELISA.

Biomarker quantitation with ligand binding assays has matured greatly in recent years. This maturation has been partly in response to demands for more data points from fewer samples or less available sample volume. Multiplexing offers opportunities to acquire data for multiple analytes from single sample assay iterations, but has its own unique challenges and limitations. ProteinSimple has developed Simple Plex™, an automated immunoassay platform consisting of microfluidic cartridge-based assays run on the Ella instrument. Ella subverts traditional multiplexing challenges by rapidly performing triplicate measurements of up to four different analytes simultaneously, each in their own respective assay vessels and all from a single sample. Here we describe a comparison of the Simple Plex platform versus colorimetric ELISA and their respective abilities to quantitate four common biomarkers (MCP-1/CCL2, VEGF-A, TNF-α, and IL-6) from twenty-eight healthy individual donor plasma samples. Each biomarker was tested on the two platforms on each of two days. Ella analysis required significantly reduced sample volume, manual steps, and total time. Overall, Ella was able to quantify results for all twenty-eight samples for each of the four biomarkers. In contrast, ELISA was able to measure quantifiable results within respective calibration curve ranges for MCP-1/CCL2 (96% of samples) and VEGFA (7% of samples). For TNF-α and IL-6, ELISA was not sensitive enough to quantify any samples in the assay ranges. This stark difference in quantitative results underscores Ella's ability to multiplex without compromising sensitivity, and has far reaching potential for biomarker panel measurement in support of diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of disease.

[1]  Masood U Khan,et al.  Recommendations for Use and Fit-for-Purpose Validation of Biomarker Multiplex Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Development , 2015, The AAPS Journal.

[2]  C T Lim,et al.  Bead-based microfluidic immunoassays: the next generation. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  Stephanie Fraser,et al.  Next Generation Ligand Binding Assays—Review of Emerging Real-Time Measurement Technologies , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[4]  R. Bone,et al.  Role of tumor necrosis factor-α in disease states and inflammation , 1993 .

[5]  Wei Song,et al.  Comparison of four distinct detection platforms using multiple ligand binding assay formats. , 2011, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  J. Margolick,et al.  Multisite Comparison of High-Sensitivity Multiplex Cytokine Assays , 2011, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[7]  Gil Mor,et al.  Simple Plex™: A Novel Multi‐Analyte, Automated Microfluidic Immunoassay Platform for the Detection of Human and Mouse Cytokines and Chemokines , 2016, American journal of reproductive immunology.

[8]  N. Ferrara,et al.  The biology of VEGF and its receptors , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[9]  M. Jordana,et al.  IL-6 is an antiinflammatory cytokine required for controlling local or systemic acute inflammatory responses. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  S. Amini,et al.  Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. , 2009, Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research.

[11]  D. Vignali,et al.  Simultaneous quantitation of 15 cytokines using a multiplexed flow cytometric assay. , 1999, Journal of immunological methods.

[12]  Yao Zhuang,et al.  Emerging Technologies to Increase Ligand Binding Assay Sensitivity , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[13]  S. Robson,et al.  Comparison of three multiplex cytokine analysis systems: Luminex, SearchLight and FAST Quant. , 2006, Journal of immunological methods.

[14]  R. Hargreaves,et al.  Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[15]  Stephanie Fraser,et al.  Active glucagon-like peptide 1 quantitation in human plasma: a comparison of multiple ligand binding assay platforms. , 2014, Journal of immunological methods.

[16]  S. Akira,et al.  Biology of multifunctional cytokines: IL 6 and related molecules (IL 1 and TNF) , 1990, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[17]  An Song,et al.  Bioanalytical qualification of clinical biomarker assays in plasma using a novel multi-analyte Simple Plex™ platform. , 2016, Bioanalysis.

[18]  Shobha Purushothama,et al.  Next Generation Ligand Binding Assays—Review of Emerging Technologies’ Capabilities to Enhance Throughput and Multiplexing , 2014, The AAPS Journal.

[19]  G. Cavet,et al.  Characterization of a multiplex, 12-biomarker test for rheumatoid arthritis. , 2012, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[20]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Reproducibility and Correlations of Multiplex Cytokine Levels in Asymptomatic Persons , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[21]  Shibing Deng,et al.  Comparison of an antibody capture and a cell capture ligand-binding assay to quantify a monoclonal therapeutic in serum. , 2011, Bioanalysis.

[22]  Lee Abberley,et al.  The Gyrolab™ immunoassay system: a platform for automated bioanalysis and rapid sample turnaround. , 2013, Bioanalysis.