Accurate intraocular pressure prediction from applanation response data using genetic algorithm and neural networks.

The fact that Goldmann applanation tonometry does not accurately account for individual corneal elastic stiffness often leads to inaccuracy in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP). IOP should account not only for the effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) but should also account for other corneal biomechanical factors. A computational method for accurate and reliable determination of IOP is investigated with a modified applanation tonometer in this paper. The proposed method uses a combined genetic algorithm/neural network procedure to match the clinically measured applanation force-displacement history with that obtained from a nonlinear finite element simulation of applanation. An additional advantage of the proposed method is that it also provides the ability to determine CCT and material properties of the cornea from the same applanation response data. The performance of the proposed method has been demonstrated through a parametric study and via comparison with a well known clinical case. The proposed method is also shown to be computationally efficient, which is an important practical consideration for clinical application.

[1]  Matthew O'Donnell,et al.  Strain Imaging of Corneal Tissue With an Ultrasound Elasticity Microscope , 2002, Cornea.

[2]  Y. Fung,et al.  Pseudoelasticity of arteries and the choice of its mathematical expression. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  J. González-Méijome,et al.  Correlations Between Corneal Biomechanical Properties Measured With the Ocular Response Analyzer and ICare Rebound Tonometry , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[4]  T. Kwon Minimally Invasive Characterization and Intraocular Pressure Measurement via Numerical Simulation of Human Cornea , 2006 .

[5]  Sunil Shah,et al.  Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  R A Moses,et al.  Increased corneal thickness simulating elevated intraocular pressure. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  N A Brennan,et al.  Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[9]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[10]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[11]  Jun Liu,et al.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: Quantitative analysis , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  Alan F. Murray,et al.  IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks , 1997 .

[13]  R. Stein,et al.  The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm , 1993, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.

[15]  Y. Hashash,et al.  Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  P. McDonnell,et al.  An ultrasonic technique for the measurement of the elastic moduli of human cornea. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  N. Ehlers,et al.  APPLANATION TONOMETRY AND CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS , 1975, Acta ophthalmologica.

[18]  M. R. Bryant,et al.  Constitutive laws for biomechanical modeling of refractive surgery. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.