The value of structured data elements from electronic health records for identifying subjects for primary care clinical trials

BackgroundAn increasing number of clinical trials are conducted in primary care settings. Making better use of existing data in the electronic health records to identify eligible subjects can improve efficiency of such studies. Our study aims to quantify the proportion of eligibility criteria that can be addressed with data in electronic health records and to compare the content of eligibility criteria in primary care with previous work.MethodsEligibility criteria were extracted from primary care studies downloaded from the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio. Criteria were broken into elemental statements. Two expert independent raters classified each statement based on whether or not structured data items in the electronic health record can be used to determine if the statement was true for a specific patient. Disagreements in classification were discussed until 100 % agreement was reached. Statements were also classified based on content and the percentages of each category were compared to two similar studies reported in the literature.ResultsEligibility criteria were retrieved from 228 studies and decomposed into 2619 criteria elemental statements. 74 % of the criteria elemental statements were considered likely associated with structured data in an electronic health record. 79 % of the studies had at least 60 % of their criteria statements addressable with structured data likely to be present in an electronic health record. Based on clinical content, most frequent categories were: “disease, symptom, and sign”, “therapy or surgery”, and “medication” (36 %, 13 %, and 10 % of total criteria statements respectively). We also identified new criteria categories related to provider and caregiver attributes (2.6 % and 1 % of total criteria statements respectively).ConclusionsElectronic health records readily contain much of the data needed to assess patients’ eligibility for clinical trials enrollment. Eligibility criteria content categories identified by our study can be incorporated as data elements in electronic health records to facilitate their integration with clinical trial management systems.

[1]  J-F Ethier,et al.  Clinical data integration model. Core interoperability ontology for research using primary care data. , 2015, Methods of information in medicine.

[2]  Chunhua Weng,et al.  Dynamic categorization of clinical research eligibility criteria by hierarchical clustering , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Claire Snowdon,et al.  Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don't understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons' experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT , 2007, Trials.

[4]  A. Kiss,et al.  Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. , 2007, JAMA.

[5]  J. Henry,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U . S . Non-Federal Acute Care Hospitals : 2008-2015 , 2013 .

[6]  Guosheng Yin,et al.  Fundamentals of Clinical Trials , 2012 .

[7]  S. Tu,et al.  OCRe: An Ontology of Clinical Research , 2009 .

[8]  Lawrence M. Fagan,et al.  T-HELPER: automated support for community-based clinical research. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[9]  Peter J. Embi,et al.  Physicians' perceptions of an electronic health record-based clinical trial alert approach to subject recruitment: A survey , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[10]  Caroline Lafitte,et al.  A European inventory of data elements for patient recruitment , 2015, MIE.

[11]  E. Hing,et al.  Visits to primary care delivery sites: United States, 2008. , 2010, NCHS data brief.

[12]  Christel Daniel-Le Bozec,et al.  An Approach for Utilizing Clinical Statements in HL7 RIM to Evaluate Eligibility Criteria , 2014, MIE.

[13]  Stuart Speedie,et al.  The Electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. , 2006, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM.

[14]  Chunhua Weng,et al.  Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[15]  N. Black Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care , 1996, BMJ.

[16]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  Evaluation of data completeness in the electronic health record for the purpose of patient recruitment into clinical trials: a retrospective analysis of element presence , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[17]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  Extension of the primary care research object model (PCROM) as clinical research information model (CRIM) for the “learning healthcare system” , 2014, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[18]  S. Tu,et al.  Analysis of Eligibility Criteria Complexity in Clinical Trials , 2010, Summit on translational bioinformatics.

[19]  Joy Adamson,et al.  The opportunities and challenges of pragmatic point-of-care randomised trials using routinely collected electronic records: evaluations of two exemplar trials. , 2014, Health technology assessment.

[20]  Chunhua Weng,et al.  Semi-Automatically Inducing Semantic Classes of Clinical Research Eligibility Criteria Using UMLS and Hierarchical Clustering. , 2010, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[21]  Xiaoying Wu,et al.  EliXR: an approach to eligibility criteria extraction and representation , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  A Taweel,et al.  An Eligibility Criteria Query Language for Heterogeneous Data Warehouses , 2014, Methods of Information in Medicine.