Superimposed perspective visual cues for helicopter hovering above amoving ship deck

The subject of the investigation is a manual low-altitude hovering task above a small moving ship deck using visual field cues supplemented by superimposed display symbology. In this task, rather than tracking the ship-deck motion, the pilot should keep the helicopter inertiaUy stable at a desired inertial position with respect to the ship deck. This hovering stage lasts until the touchdown can be performed during some period of quiescent ship motion. The main difficulties during this task arise from the lack of appropriate visual references necessary to keep the helicopter inertially stable above the ship deck. This research investigates, both analytically and experimentally, the effects of the information superimposed on the visual field on hovering performance. This additional visual information can be implemented by inertial references generated on the ship deck, and/or by a helicopter-based head-up display. For the ship-deck references, inertially stable, three-dimensional visual structures such as line-drawn cubes are investigated. For the head-up display information, only an artificial horizon is investigated. The results of the investigation clearly show that hovering performance is improved by the inclusion of inertially stable visual cues. Moreover, it is shown that the performance is almost independent of the size of the three-dimensional structure. Thus, it is possible to implement the ship-based visual references within practical physical dimensions.

[1]  Donald E. Beck Navy Shipboard Trials of Helicopters and V/STOL Aircraft , 1975 .

[2]  T. Govindaraj,et al.  Analysis of a VTOL hover task with predictor displays using an optimal control model of the human operator , 1978 .

[3]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  The Human as an Optimal Controller and Information Processor , 1969 .

[4]  David H. Weir,et al.  A THEORY FOR DRIVER STEERING CONTROL OF MOTOR VEHICLES , 1968 .

[5]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  Application of optimal control theory to the prediction of human performance in a complex task , 1970 .

[6]  Fredric H. Schmitz,et al.  In-Flight Far-Field Measurement of Helicopter Impulsive Noise , 1976 .

[7]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part I: Theory and validation , 1970 .

[8]  R. A. Hess,et al.  A model-based analysis of a display for helicopter landing approach , 1976 .

[9]  R. M. Gerdes,et al.  VTOL controls for shipboard operations , 1983 .

[10]  D. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part II: Prediction of human performance in a complex task , 1970 .

[11]  C. H. Paulk,et al.  Evaluation of control and display configurations for helicopter shipboard operations , 1983 .

[12]  Ronald A. Hess Application of a Model-Based Flight Director Design Technique to a Longitudinal Hover Task , 1977 .

[13]  P. H. Wewerinke Mathematical models of pilot-helicopter systems , 1979 .

[14]  P. H. Wewerinke Visual scene perception process involved in the manual approach , 1978 .

[15]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  Optimal control of linear systems with time-delay and observation noise , 1969 .

[16]  D. Carico,et al.  Dynamic interface flight test and simulation limitations , 1985 .

[17]  P. H. Wewerinke Effort involved in single- and two-axis manual control systems , 1974 .

[18]  Stanley F. Schmidt,et al.  Evaluation of the navigation performance of shipboard-VTOL-landing guidance systems , 1981 .

[19]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[20]  Arthur J. Grunwald,et al.  Vehicular Control by Visual Field Cues-analytical Model and Experimental Validation , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  L. A. Mcgee,et al.  Navigation performance of the Triscan concept for shipboard VTOL aircraft operations , 1978 .

[22]  P. H. Wewerinke The Effect of Visual Information on the Manual Approach and Landing , 1980 .

[23]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  A Model for Human Controller Remnant , 1969 .