Attenuation Correction Approaches for Serotonin Transporter Quantification With PET/MRI

Background Several MR-based attenuation correction (AC) approaches were developed to conquer the challenging AC in hybrid PET/MR imaging. These AC methods are commonly evaluated on standardized uptake values or tissue concentration. However, in neurotransmitter system studies absolute quantification is more favorable due to its accuracy. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the accuracy of segmentation- and atlas-based MR AC approaches on serotonin transporter (SERT) distribution volumes and occupancy after a drug challenge. Methods 18 healthy subjects (7 male) underwent two [11C]DASB PET/MRI measurements in a double-blinded, placebo controlled, cross-over design. After 70 min the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram or a placebo was infused. The parameters total and specific volume of distribution (VT, VS = BPP) and occupancy were quantified. All subjects underwent a low-dose CT scan as reference AC method. Besides the standard AC approaches DIXON and UTE, a T1-weighted structural image was recorded to estimate a pseudo-CT based on an MR/CT database (pseudoCT). Another evaluated AC approach superimposed a bone model on AC DIXON. Lastly, an approach optimizing the segmentation of UTE images was analyzed (RESOLUTE). PET emission data were reconstructed with all 6 AC methods. The accuracy of the AC approaches was evaluated on a region of interest-basis for the parameters VT, BPP, and occupancy with respect to the results of AC CT. Results Variations for VT and BPP were found with all AC methods with bias ranging from −15 to 17%. The smallest relative errors for all regions were found with AC pseudoCT (<|5%|). Although the bias between BPP SSRI and BPP placebo varied markedly with AC DIXON (<|12%|) and AC UTE (<|9%|), a high correlation to AC CT was obtained (r2∼1). The relative difference of the occupancy for all tested AC methods was small for SERT high binding regions (<|4%|). Conclusion The high correlation might offer a rescaling from the biased parameters VT and BPP to the true values. Overall, the pseudoCT approach yielded smallest errors and the best agreement with AC CT. For SERT occupancy, all AC methods showed little bias in high binding regions, indicating that errors may cancel out in longitudinal assessments.

[1]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  Cerebral serotonin transporter measurements with [11C]DASB: A review on acquisition and preprocessing across 21 PET centres , 2019, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  G. Searle,et al.  PET-MR Attenuation Correction in Dynamic Brain PET Using [11C]Cimbi-36: A Direct Comparison With PET-CT , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[3]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Attenuation correction for brain PET imaging using deep neural network based on Dixon and ZTE MR images , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  Task-relevant brain networks identified with simultaneous PET/MR imaging of metabolism and connectivity , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[5]  Lucas Rischka,et al.  Simple and rapid quantification of serotonin transporter binding using [11C]DASB bolus plus constant infusion , 2017, NeuroImage.

[6]  N. Costes,et al.  Multi-atlas attenuation correction supports full quantification of static and dynamic brain PET data in PET-MR , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T. Beyer,et al.  PET/MRI for Oncologic Brain Imaging: A Comparison of Standard MR-Based Attenuation Corrections with a Model-Based Approach for the Siemens mMR PET/MR System , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  A multi-centre evaluation of eleven clinically feasible brain PET/MRI attenuation correction techniques using a large cohort of patients , 2016, NeuroImage.

[9]  Nasal respiration entrains delta-frequency oscillations in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of rodents , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[10]  B. Gulyás,et al.  Guidelines to PET measurements of the target occupancy in the brain for drug development , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  T. Beyer,et al.  Reproducibility of MRI Dixon-Based Attenuation Correction in Combined PET/MR with Applications for Lean Body Mass Estimation , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  S. Ourselin,et al.  Multi-Atlas–Based Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET Imaging Using a Time-of-Flight PET/MR Scanner: Comparison with Clinical Single-Atlas– and CT-Based Attenuation Correction , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  G. Hermosillo,et al.  Dixon Sequence with Superimposed Model-Based Bone Compartment Provides Highly Accurate PET/MR Attenuation Correction of the Brain , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Yusheng Li,et al.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review. , 2016, Medical physics.

[15]  S. Holm,et al.  Region specific optimization of continuous linear attenuation coefficients based on UTE (RESOLUTE): application to PET/MR brain imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  G. Hermosillo,et al.  Whole-Body PET/MR Imaging: Quantitative Evaluation of a Novel Model-Based MR Attenuation Correction Method Including Bone , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Live Eikenes,et al.  PET/MR brain imaging: evaluation of clinical UTE-based attenuation correction , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  G. Delso,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Zero-Echo-Time MR Imaging for the Segmentation of the Skull , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  Ian Law,et al.  Impact of incorrect tissue classification in Dixon-based MR-AC: fat-water tissue inversion , 2014, EJNMMI Physics.

[20]  Kevin T. Chen,et al.  An SPM8-Based Approach for Attenuation Correction Combining Segmentation and Nonrigid Template Formation: Application to Simultaneous PET/MR Brain Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Jieqing Jiao,et al.  Effect of scatter correction when comparing attenuation maps: Application to brain PET/MR , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[22]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  Attenuation Correction Synthesis for Hybrid PET-MR Scanners: Application to Brain Studies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Ian Law,et al.  Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone , 2014, NeuroImage.

[24]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Neurovascular coupling to D2/D3 dopamine receptor occupancy using simultaneous PET/functional MRI , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  B. Rosen,et al.  PET and MR Imaging: The Odd Couple or a Match Made in Heaven? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Alan A. Wilson,et al.  Radiosynthesis and Evaluation of [11C-Carbonyl]-Labeled Carbamates as Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Radiotracers for Positron Emission Tomography , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Hybrid PET/MRI Systems: A 4-Class Tissue Segmentation Technique Using a Combined Ultrashort-Echo-Time/Dixon MRI Sequence , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  Lula Rosso,et al.  Quantification of Ligand PET Studies using a Reference Region with a Displaceable Fraction: Application to Occupancy Studies with [11C]-DASB as an Example , 2012, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[29]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Toward Implementing an MRI-Based PET Attenuation-Correction Method for Neurologic Studies on the MR-PET Brain Prototype , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  J. Provenzale,et al.  PET/CT today and tomorrow in veterinary cancer diagnosis and monitoring: fundamentals, early results and future perspectives. , 2010, Veterinary and comparative oncology.

[31]  R. Günther,et al.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[32]  Koen Van Laere,et al.  EANM procedure guidelines for PET brain imaging using [18F]FDG, version 2 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  R Dudczak,et al.  Simple and rapid preparation of [11C]DASB with high quality and reliability for routine applications. , 2009, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[34]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  R. P. Maguire,et al.  Consensus Nomenclature for in vivo Imaging of Reversibly Binding Radioligands , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[36]  Ramin V. Parsey,et al.  Acute Occupancy of Brain Serotonin Transporter by Sertraline as Measured by [11C]DASB and Positron Emission Tomography , 2006, Biological Psychiatry.

[37]  D. Townsend,et al.  Method for transforming CT images for attenuation correction in PET/CT imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[38]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[39]  Alan A. Wilson,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Quantification of [11C]-DASB Binding to the Human Serotonin Transporter: Modeling Strategies , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[40]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[41]  D. Bailey Transmission scanning in emission tomography , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  W. T. Dixon Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. , 1984, Radiology.

[43]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 2. Effects of inaccurate attenuation correction. , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.