Motor memories in manipulation tasks are linked to contact goals between objects.

Skillful manipulation requires forming memories of object dynamics, linking applied force to motion. Although it has been assumed that such memories are linked to objects, a recent study showed that people can form separate memories when these are linked to different controlled points on an object (Heald et al. 2018). In that study, participants controlled the handle of a robotic device to move a virtual bar with circles (control points) on the left and right sides. Participants were instructed to move either the left or right control point to a target on the left or right, respectively, such that the required movement was constant. When these control points were paired with opposing force fields, adaptation was observed. In this previous study, both the controlled point and the target changed between contexts. To assess which of these factors is critical for learning, here we used a similar paradigm but with a bar that automatically rotated as it was moved. In the first experiment, the bar rotated such that the left and right control points moved to a common target. In the second experiment, the bar rotated such that a single control point moved to a target located on either the left or right. In both experiments, participants were able to learn opposing force fields applied in the two contexts. We conclude that separate memories of dynamics can be formed for different 'contact goals' involving a unique combination of the controlled point on an object and the target location this point 'contacts'.

[1]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The effect of contextual cues on the encoding of motor memories , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning , 2006, PLoS biology.

[3]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The Value of the Follow-Through Derives from Motor Learning Depending on Future Actions , 2015, Current Biology.

[4]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  D. Nozaki,et al.  Distinct Motor Plans Form and Retrieve Distinct Motor Memories for Physically Identical Movements , 2012, Current Biology.

[6]  Stephen H Scott,et al.  Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Flexible Representations of Dynamics Are Used in Object Manipulation , 2008, Current Biology.

[8]  T. Brashers-Krug,et al.  Functional Stages in the Formation of Human Long-Term Motor Memory , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Short-term plasticity of the primary somatosensory cortex during tool use , 2004, Neuroreport.

[11]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives , 2000, Nature.

[13]  S. Scott,et al.  Multi-compartment model can explain partial transfer of learning within the same limb between unimanual and bimanual reaching , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  P. Gribble,et al.  Are there distinct neural representations of object and limb dynamics? , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  R A Scheidt,et al.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Gone in 0.6 Seconds: The Encoding of Motor Memories Depends on Recent Sensorimotor States , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Ichinose,et al.  Extension of Corticocortical Afferents into the Anterior Bank of the Intraparietal Sulcus by Tool-use Training in Adult Monkeys , 2005 .

[20]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  T. Schormann,et al.  Activation in the Ipsilateral Posterior Parietal Cortex during Tool Use: A PET Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Motor learning of novel dynamics is not represented in a single global coordinate system: evaluation of mixed coordinate representations and local learning , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[24]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  David W Franklin,et al.  Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  H. Onoe,et al.  Functional Brain Mapping of Monkey Tool Use , 2001, NeuroImage.

[29]  S. Scott The computational and neural basis of voluntary motor control and planning , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Fast But Fleeting: Adaptive Motor Learning Processes Associated with Aging and Cognitive Decline , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Failure to Consolidate the Consolidation Theory of Learning for Sensorimotor Adaptation Tasks , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[34]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Neural Correlates of Internal-Model Loading , 2006, Current Biology.

[36]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Separate motor memories are formed when controlling different implicitly specified locations on a tool. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[38]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Multiple motor memories are learned to control different points on a tool , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.