Baseline Characteristics and Use of Pretherapeutic 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET for Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy. Surgical resection is the only curative modality combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy to improve survival. Given the limitations of traditional responses such as cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRI) or tumor markers, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), the 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines included 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET as an adjunct to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are common misconceptions on the metabolic activity (tumor avidity) in PDAC so we aimed to describe the baseline characteristics and use of FDG-PET in a cohort of treatment-naive patients with PDAC. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center retrospective study was conducted capturing all biopsy-proven, treatment-naive patients with PDAC who underwent either baseline FDG-PET/CT or FDG-PET/MRI imaging between 2008 and 2023. Baseline FDG-PET characteristics were collected, including primary tumors’ maximum standardized uptake value defined as metabolic activity (FDG uptake) of tumor compared with surrounding pancreatic parenchymal background, and the identification of extrapancreatic metastatic disease. RESULTS: We identified 1,095 treatment-naive patients with PDAC who underwent baseline FDG-PET imaging at diagnosis. CA19-9 was elevated in 76% of patients. Overall, 96.3% (1,054) of patients had FDG-avid tumors with a median maximum standardized uptake value of 6.4. FDG-PET also identified suspicious extrapancreatic metastatic lesions in 50% of patients, with a higher proportion (p < 0.001) in PET/MRI (59.9%) vs PET/CT (44.3%). After controlling for CA19-9 elevation, PET/MRI was superior in detection of extrapancreatic lesions compared with PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET has significant use in PDAC as a baseline imaging modality earlier neoadjuvant therapy given the majority of tumors are FDG-avid. FDG-PET can identify additional extrapancreatic suspicious lesions allowing for optimal initial staging, with PET/MRI having increased sensitivity over PET/CT.

[1]  D. Morgan,et al.  PET/MRI for evaluation of patients with pancreatic cancer , 2023, Abdominal Radiology.

[2]  M. Kendrick,et al.  Yield of Staging Laparoscopy for Pancreatic Cancer in the Modern Era: Analysis of More than 1,000 Consecutive Patients , 2023, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  J. Heo,et al.  Pathological Response Predicts Survival after Pancreatectomy following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for Pancreatic Cancer , 2022, Cancers.

[4]  Nguyen H. Tran,et al.  FDG-PET Predicts Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Survival in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. , 2022, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[5]  M. Kendrick,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Switch in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer , 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[6]  Zeyu Zhang,et al.  Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with pancreatic cancer , 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  M. Kendrick,et al.  Molecular Peritoneal Staging for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Mutant KRAS Droplet-Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction: Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  E. Nakakura,et al.  Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[9]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Evaluation of Pathologic Response on Overall Survival After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma , 2020, Pancreas.

[10]  M. Katz,et al.  Response to Preoperative Therapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[11]  A. Ejaz,et al.  Pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: defining the incidence, predictors, and outcomes. , 2020, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[12]  H. Zeh,et al.  Serum CA19-9 Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Predicts Tumor Size Reduction and Survival in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma , 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  W. Harmsen,et al.  Factors Predicting Response, Perioperative Outcomes, and Survival Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Borderline/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[14]  Yu-Ting Chang,et al.  Multiparametric PET/MR imaging biomarkers are associated with overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Fiona Campbell,et al.  PET-PANC: multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy and health economic analysis study of the impact of combined modality 18fluorine-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography scanning in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. , 2018, Health technology assessment.

[16]  D. Hough,et al.  The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma , 2018, Abdominal Radiology.

[17]  V. Pérez-Dueñas,et al.  Simultaneous PET/MRI vs PET/CT in oncology. A systematic review. , 2016, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular.

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  Zhen Wang,et al.  FDG-PET in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis. , 2013, World journal of gastroenterology.

[20]  B. Lapuyade,et al.  An evaluation of the accuracy of CT when determining resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[21]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Response of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer to neoadjuvant therapy is not reflected by radiographic indicators , 2012, Cancer.

[22]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Multimodality therapy offers a chance for cure in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma deemed unresectable at first operative exploration. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[23]  O. Ratib,et al.  Value of contrast‐enhanced 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in detection and presurgical assessment of pancreatic cancer: A prospective study , 2011, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[24]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  "Radiological and Surgical Implications of Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX for Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer." , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[25]  Irina Rinta-Kiikka,et al.  F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography, Multidetector Row Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer , 2009 .