Comparing black-capped (Poecile atricapillus) and mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli): use of geometric and featural information in a spatial orientation task

Since Cheng (Cognition 23:149–178, 1986) first proposed the “geometric module” in rats, a great deal of research has focused on how other species use geometric information and how geometric encoding may differ across species. Here, hand-reared and wild-caught black-capped chickadees and wild-caught mountain chickadees searched for food hidden in one corner in a rectangular environment. Previous research has shown that mountain chickadees do not spontaneously encode geometric information when a salient feature is present near the goal location. Using a slightly different training and testing procedure, we found that both hand-reared and wild-caught black-capped chickadees encoded geometric information, even in the presence of a salient landmark. Some, but not all, mountain chickadees also encoded geometric information. Overall, our results suggest that use of geometric information may be a less preferred strategy for mountain chickadees than for either wild-caught or hand-reared black-capped chickadees. To our knowledge, this is the first direct interspecies comparison of use of geometric information in a spatial orientation task.

[1]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[2]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[3]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  Peter L. Hurd,et al.  Growing in Circles , 2007 .

[5]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[6]  Antoine Wystrach,et al.  Ants Learn Geometry and Features , 2009, Current Biology.

[7]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[8]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[9]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  How do young children determine location? Evidence from disorientation tasks , 2006, Cognition.

[10]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[11]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[12]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[13]  R. Griffiths,et al.  A DNA test to sex most birds , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[14]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Eye use in search is determined by the nature of task in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Using geometry to specify location: implications for spatial coding in children and nonhuman animals , 2007, Psychological research.

[16]  Nicola S Clayton,et al.  A test of the adaptive specialization hypothesis: population differences in caching, memory, and the hippocampus in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla). , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[18]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[20]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[21]  B. G. Hill,et al.  Ecological relations of sympatric Black-capped and Mountain Chickadees in southwestern Alberta , 1988 .

[22]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.

[23]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[24]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures: comparative and developmental perspectives , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[25]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[26]  K. Cheng.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[27]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Hemispheric processing of landmark and geometric information in male and female domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[29]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  C. Gallistel.  The organization of learning , 1990 .