Optimum array signal processing in the presence of imperfect spatial coherence of wavefronts

Traditionally optimum-adaptive beamforming algorithms have been developed assuming fully coherent plane wavefronts, i.e., assuming a data model of point sources. In most applications this assumption is inappropriate, since the channel model has to account for different kinds of dispersion phenomena due to both the propagation environment and the array itself. Significant examples are sonar and underwater communication systems. Indeed, in such circumstances, the resulting wavefronts can be randomly distorted, usually suffering a loss of spatial coherence. Here, assuming a more realistic stochastic channel model, we analyze the performance of a traditional optimum adaptive beamformer for point sources, when the signal or the interference undergo a spatial coherence degradation. It is shown, with analytical details, that the same coherence loss, for the interference results in larger performance degradation than for the signal, Furthermore, we provide a theoretical comparison among different beamforming algorithms, based on the estimate of the channel parameters and on spatial smoothing methods.

[1]  Alex B. Gershman,et al.  Constrained Hung-Turner adaptive beam-forming algorithm with additional robustness to wideband and moving jammers , 1996 .

[2]  William M. Carey,et al.  Measurement of sound propagation downslope to a bottom‐limited sound channel , 1985 .

[3]  S. Unnikrishna Pillai,et al.  Forward/backward spatial smoothing techniques for coherent signal identification , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Coherence effects on the detection performance of quadratic array processors, with applications to large-array matched-field beamforming , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[5]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Analysis of Signal Cancellation Due To Multipath in Optimum Beamformers for Moving Arrays , 1987 .

[6]  B. Ottersten,et al.  Signal waveform estimation from array data in angular spread environment , 1996, Conference Record of The Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[7]  Bjorn Ottersten,et al.  On Approximating a Spatially Scattered Source with Two Point Sources , 1998 .

[8]  Roger Dashen,et al.  Path-Integral Treatment of Acoustic Mutual Coherence Functions for Rays in a Sound Channel, , 1985 .

[9]  T. Kailath,et al.  Direction of arrival estimation by eigenstructure methods with imperfect spatial coherence of wave fronts , 1988 .

[10]  K. M. Wong,et al.  Estimation of the directions of arrival of spatially dispersed signals in array processing , 1996 .

[11]  H. Cox Line Array Performance When the Signal Coherence is Spatially Dependent , 1973 .

[12]  Shahrokh Valaee,et al.  Parametric localization of distributed sources , 1995, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Coherence effects on the detection performance of quadratic array processors, with applications to large‐array matched‐field beamforming , 1990 .