Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Process Innovation in the Chemical Industry

Achieving a well‐balanced innovation portfolio is an often advocated goal for R&D managers, but guidelines how to achieve this are scarce in the innovation and management literature. In this study, we investigate the effects that balancing R&D budget allocation between exploratory and exploitative innovation activities has on new product performance. Furthermore, we distinguish between product and process exploratory and exploitative innovation activities offering a new and highly relevant contingency perspective on the requirement to balance exploratory and exploitative innovation activities within a portfolio. In doing so, we integrate these two important dimensions of innovative activity in a framework that can help senior managers to decide how to allocate scarce R&D resources within an innovation portfolio to maximize returns. Based on a unique data set of objective, internal financial accounting data from strategic business units in the chemical industry, we found not only that new product performance is enhanced through the simultaneous pursuit of exploratory and exploitative innovation activities (i.e., they are complementary) which holds true for product and process innovation alike. But we are also able to show that in process innovation, exploration requires more funding to achieve maximal performance when compared to product innovation. An imbalance of exploration and exploitation has less severe consequences than in product innovation efforts. Our study design that is based on firm‐internal R&D budget data allows R&D managers to directly compare their budget allocation practice with our findings that are derived from a wide range of business units in one of the main process industries. Furthermore, our results have important implications for the practice of R&D budget allocation, since they highlight how product and process innovation efforts differ with respect to their impact of the exploration–exploitation balance on new product performance relationship.

[1]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[2]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[3]  Lena Abrahamsson,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Firms’ Process Innovation Capability: A Literature Review and a Conceptual Framework , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[5]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[6]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[7]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[8]  A. Richter,et al.  The Whole Is More Than the Sum of Its Parts— Or Is It? A Review of the Empirical Literature on Complementarities in Organizations , 2010 .

[9]  Thomas Lager,et al.  A Structural Analysis of Process Development in Process Industry: A New Classification System for Strategic Project Selection and Portfolio Balancing , 2002 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[11]  S. Fraser,et al.  Radical innovation through internal corporate venturing: Degussa's commercialization of nanomaterials , 2008 .

[12]  Basil Achilladelis,et al.  The dynamics of technological innovation: the case of the pharmaceutical industry , 2001 .

[13]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view , 1999 .

[14]  M. Ceccagnoli,et al.  Corporate Restructuring and R&D: A Panel Data Analysis for the Chemical Industry , 2000 .

[15]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[16]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[17]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[18]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  Innovation and Employment: Process Versus Product Innovation , 2001 .

[19]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Technological newness: An empirical study in the process industries , 1996 .

[20]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation , 1996 .

[21]  Mike Gregory,et al.  Product and Process Innovation in Biopharmaceuticals: A New Perspective on Development , 2006 .

[22]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[23]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[24]  Thomas Lager,et al.  PRODUCT AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY IN PROCESS INDUSTRY: A CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOCATION OF COMPANY RESOURCES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY , 2002 .

[25]  B. Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm , 2010 .

[26]  James Henderson,et al.  Learning to time capacity expansions: An empirical analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry, 1975-95 , 2003 .

[27]  A. Hayes,et al.  Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Stylianos Kavadias,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Managing the New Product Development Portfolio: When and How to Use Strategic Buckets , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[29]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations , 2001 .

[30]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[31]  J. D. Hess,et al.  Mean-Centering Does Not Alleviate Collinearity Problems in Moderated Multiple Regression Models , 2007 .

[32]  Jens Leker,et al.  Marketing in der chemischen Industrie , 2004 .

[33]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms , 2002 .

[34]  Pankaj Ghemawat,et al.  CAPACITY EXPANSION IN THE TITANIUM DIOXIDE INDUSTRY , 1984 .

[35]  G. Pisano Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[36]  Albert B. Schwarzkopf,et al.  A study of innovation in the pesticide industry: Analysis of the innovation record of an industrial sector , 1987 .

[37]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[38]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  The new logic of high-tech R&D , 1999 .

[39]  Kornelius Kraft,et al.  Are product and Process Innovations Independent of Each Other , 1990 .

[40]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[41]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[42]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[43]  M. Lieberman The Learning Curve and Pricing in the Chemical Processing Industries , 1984 .

[44]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[45]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Product Portfolio Management : Practices and Performance , 1999 .

[46]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Dynamic Portfolio Selection of NPD Programs Using Marginal Returns , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[47]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[48]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  Innovation in Process Plant: A Case Study of Ethylene , 1995 .

[49]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[50]  Robert A. Linn Product Development in the Chemical Industry: A Description of a Maturing Business* , 1984 .

[51]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[52]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[54]  Roberto Simonetti,et al.  Product and process innovations: How are they defined? How are they quantified? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[55]  S. Klepper Industry Life Cycles , 1997 .

[56]  van Jw Arjan Rooij How R&D helped transform DSM , 2008 .

[57]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[58]  Traci Carte,et al.  In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions , 2003, MIS Q..

[59]  Bart van Looy,et al.  Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms , 2009 .

[60]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  R&D, innovation and competitiveness in the European chemical industry , 2004 .

[61]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[62]  Ester Martínez-Ros,et al.  EXPLAINING THE DECISIONS TO CARRY OUT PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATIONS IN THE SPANISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY , 1998 .

[63]  Thomas Brambor,et al.  Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses , 2006, Political Analysis.

[64]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[65]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? , 2012 .

[66]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[67]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[68]  Souresh Saha,et al.  Consumer preferences and product and process R&D , 2007 .

[69]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  What's Experience Got to Do With It? Sources of Cost Reduction in a Large Specialty Chemicals Producer , 2000 .

[70]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[71]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Composition of R and D Expenditures: Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output , 1981 .

[72]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[73]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[74]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[75]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Where process development begins: A multiple case study of front end activities in process firms , 2011 .