The Effect of Simulated Threat on Task Performance During Emotion Recognition

Being able to de-escalate aggressive behavior during face-to-face interactions is an important skill for employees in a variety of domains. To do this effectively, employees should learn to recognize the emotional state of their conversation partner. However, this task can be seriously hindered by the stress triggered by the aggressive encounter. To gain more insight in the impact of threat on task performance during emotion recognition, 30 participants were asked to perform an emotion recognition task using pictures of virtual characters. Each participant performed the task two times, once under normal circumstances, and once in a 'stress' condition in which threatening stimuli were presented whenever a wrong answer was given. Additionally, all 30 participants performed a second, mathematical task, also under a normal and a 'stress' condition. Counterbalancing was used to control for order effects. The results indicate that there was a negative impact of the simulated threat on performance in the emotion recognition task, but not in the mathematical task. In follow-up research, these results will be used to develop an adaptive serious game for public service workers, with which they can train their aggression de-escalation skills in a personalized manner.

[1]  Kenneth H. Rubin,et al.  The development and treatment of childhood aggression. , 1991 .

[2]  K. Hiraki,et al.  Negative emotion modulates prefrontal cortex activity during a working memory task: a NIRS study , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  G. Zajicek.  Wisdom of the body , 1999 .

[4]  G. Bonner,et al.  A pilot study to test an intervention for dealing with verbal aggression. , 2010, British journal of nursing.

[5]  A. Heuvelink,et al.  A cognitive Feedback Generating Agent , 2008 .

[6]  Tibor Bosse,et al.  Towards Aggression De-escalation Training with Virtual Agents: A Computational Model , 2014, HCI.

[7]  R. Oudejans,et al.  Effects of anxiety, a cognitive secondary task, and expertise on gaze behavior and performance in a far aiming task , 2012 .

[8]  R. Malinow,et al.  Negative learning bias is associated with risk aversion in a genetic animal model of depression , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  A. Ohman.  Fear and anxiety : Evolutionary, cognitive and clinical perspectives , 1993 .

[10]  P. Lang.  International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[11]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. , 2007, Emotion.

[12]  R. Madeley,et al.  Violence and aggression in the emergency department , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[13]  L. N. Anderson,et al.  DE-ESCALATING VERBAL AGGRESSION IN PRIMARY AGESSION IN PRIMARY CARE SETTINGS , 1996 .

[14]  M. Ashcraft,et al.  The effects of anxious responding on mental arithmetic and lexical decision task performance. , 2003, Journal of anxiety disorders.

[15]  R. Clarke,et al.  Crime and Public Transport , 2000, Crime and Justice.

[16]  Donald R. Lynam,et al.  Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences , 2006 .

[17]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Serious games : mechanisms and effects , 2009 .

[18]  John C DelBel.  De-escalating workplace aggression. , 2003, Nursing management.

[19]  K. Dodge,et al.  The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression. , 1991 .

[20]  G. Zajicek,et al.  The Wisdom of the Body , 1934, Nature.

[21]  Tina Mioch,et al.  FeGA: A Feedback-Generating Agent , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[22]  L N Anderson,et al.  De-escalating verbal aggression in primary care settings. , 1996, The Nurse practitioner.

[23]  M. Staal.  Stress, Cognition, and Human Performance: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework , 2013 .

[24]  R. Simons,et al.  Observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children's anger: relations to reactive versus proactive aggression. , 2002, Child Development.