Function-technology platforms improve efficiency in high-tech equipment manufacturing : a case study in complex products and systems (CoPS)

– Success in manufacturing industries often depends on the ability of a firm to apply product platforms. In speeding up product development, platforms often enable companies to benefit from scale effects by reusing existing components in the development of new products. In the delivery of complex products and system (CoPS), however, platforms are frequently modified since components have to be changed within their life cycle to meet additional customer-specific engineering demands and evolving innovations in technology. In this article, it will be illustrated that intangible design elements can be used as platforms in firms that deliver CoPS. The paper aims to discuss these issues. , – Through extensive fieldwork at a leading supplier of science-based lithography machinery, a modified platform concept was developed and tested that is labelled as the function-technology (FT) platform. The longitudinal data, collected on site, demonstrate positive effects of applying FT platforms. , – The results show that an important explanation for firm's success in delivering lithography machinery with attractive performance is their ability to deliver variants that are specific in terms of physical modules, but common in terms of functions and technologies. Based on the results, it can be argued that establishing an FT platform will allow the efficient creation of variants within a family of CoPS. , – The findings add considerable insight to the existing literature on operations management by explaining how intangible design elements, instigated during development, can be reused in the delivery of CoPS. Moreover, it enables development managers to more easily structure and reuse complex development tasks.

[1]  Hans Wortmann,et al.  Product platform life cycles: a multiple case study , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[2]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[3]  Maximilian Pasche,et al.  Effects of platforms on new product development projects , 2011 .

[4]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[5]  Linda L. Zhang,et al.  Process platform representation based on Unified Modelling Language , 2007 .

[6]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Creating a platform-based approach for developing new services , 2001 .

[7]  Alison McKay,et al.  Relating product definition and product variety , 1996 .

[8]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Multibranded Platform Development: A Corporate Strategy with Multimanagerial Challenges , 2007 .

[9]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[10]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Platform strategies in international new product development , 1999 .

[11]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[12]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in complex products and system , 2000 .

[13]  A. Griffin Metrics for Measuring Product Development Cycle Time , 1993 .

[14]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[15]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[16]  Adrian P. Hofer,et al.  Complex products and systems: Potential from using layout platforms , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[17]  Hiroyuki Chuma Increasing complexity and limits of organization in the microlithography industry: implications for science-based industries , 2006 .

[18]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[19]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[20]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  A framework for performance-based design , 1993 .

[21]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[22]  Freek Erens,et al.  Architectures for product families , 1997 .

[23]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[24]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products , 2003, J. Intell. Manuf..

[25]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Platform driven development of product families: Linking theory with practice , 2003 .

[26]  S. Barley Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Field Work , 1990 .

[27]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[28]  Sylvain Lenfle,et al.  Platform re-use : lessons from the automotive industry , 2010 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.