Developing Knowledge Through IS Design Science Research: For Whom, What Type of Knowledge, and How?

[1]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  Towards a Design Theory for Synchronous Computer-mediated communication in E-Learning Environments , 2007 .

[2]  van Je Joan Aken,et al.  The Nature of Organizing Design: both like and unlike material object design , 2006 .

[3]  Martin Lipscomb,et al.  Critical Realism, Post‐positivism and the Possibility of Knowledge , 2006 .

[4]  JINWEI CAO,et al.  Interactions Between System Evaluation And Theory Testing: A Demonstration of the Power of a Mulitfaceted Approach to Systems Research , 2006 .

[5]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems : the state of the field , 2006 .

[6]  James D. McKeen,et al.  IT in 2010: The Next Frontier , 2006, MIS Q. Executive.

[7]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Interactions Between System Evaluation and Theory Testing: A Demonstration of the Power of a Multifaceted Approach to Information Systems Research , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Terry Ryan,et al.  The Information Technology Workforce: Trends and Implications 2005-2008 , 2006, MIS Q. Executive.

[9]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[10]  Sven A. Carlsson,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Design Research Framework: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2006 .

[11]  P. Hedström.  Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology , 2005 .

[12]  Strategic ERP Extension and Use , 2005 .

[13]  W. Bennis,et al.  How business schools lost their way. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[14]  J. Aken.  Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management , 2005 .

[15]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[16]  Judy McKay,et al.  A review of design science in information systems , 2005 .

[17]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[18]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[19]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[20]  R. Bhaskar.  From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment , 2003 .

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[22]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  The IS Core IX: The 3 Faces of IS Identity: Connection, Immersion, and Fusion , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Frada Burstein,et al.  Chapter 8 – System development in information systems research , 2002 .

[24]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The Double Hurdles for Management Research , 1997 .

[25]  H. Simon.  The Sciences of the Artificial, (Third edition) , 1997 .

[26]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[28]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[30]  P. Pettit.  The Possibility of Naturalism. , 1981 .

[31]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[32]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[33]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .