Tissue polarimetric study I: In search of reference parameters and depolarizing Mueller matrix model of ex vivo colon samples

Upon polarimetry the polarization state of light can be obtained for different depolarizing or non-depolarizing medias such as biological specimens. Tissue polarimetry can facilitate a differentiation between healthy and (pre)cancerous tissues, without using any contrast agents and ionizing radiation. Early cancer detection is vital to increase the life expectancy of patients. Turbid medias like biological tissues can change the state and/or decrease the initial polarization of light. Circularly polarized light is preferred as found to possess better ability to detect abnormal changes in tissues, compared to linearly polarized light. In this paper we analyse polarimetric parameters, measured with Thorlabs Stokes meter included in tissue polarimetric experimental set- up in reflection geometry and multiple ex vivo colon samples. The polarimetric device operates in the spectral range between 400 nm and 700 nm, where all experiments had been conducted with wavelength of 635 nm. By reaching reference values for the polarimetric parameters we can propose a theoretical Mueller matrix, that can be used to describe the depolarization properties of the colon samples used in the experiments. The proposed Mueller matrix is to be modelled and experimentally validated to find out if it matches the theory and can be further decomposed to three matrices of depolarization, diattenuation and retardance. All of the aforementioned experimental approaches are a step closer to a pre-clinical trial, which is a bridge to the final and the most challenging goal - tissue polarimetric set-up for in vivo diagnostics.

[1]  Nirmalya Ghosh,et al.  Tissue polarimetry: concepts, challenges, applications, and outlook. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Mueller matrix dual-rotating retarder polarimeter. , 1992, Applied optics.

[3]  Ayan Banerjee,et al.  Turbid medium polarimetry in biomedical imaging and diagnosis , 2011 .

[4]  A. Welch,et al.  A review of the optical properties of biological tissues , 1990 .

[5]  Rasheed M. A. Azzam,et al.  Propagation of partially polarized light through anisotropic media with or without depolarization: A differential 4 × 4 matrix calculus , 1978 .

[6]  Igor Meglinski,et al.  Application of circularly polarized light for non‐invasive diagnosis of cancerous tissues and turbid tissue‐like scattering media , 2015, Journal of biophotonics.

[7]  Callum M. Macdonald,et al.  Diffusing-wave polarimetry for tissue diagnostics , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[8]  Azael Mora-Núñez,et al.  Optical characterization of murine model's in-vivo skin using Mueller matrix polarimetric imaging , 2015, SPIE/OSJ Biophotonics Japan.

[9]  R. Chipman,et al.  Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition , 1996 .

[10]  J Stephen Jones,et al.  Prostate cancer detection after a negative prostate biopsy: Lessons learnt in the Cleveland Clinic experience , 2011, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[11]  Razvigor Ossikovski,et al.  Polarized Light and the Mueller Matrix Approach , 2016 .

[12]  Dennis H. Goldstein,et al.  Applications and limitations of polarimetry , 1990, Other Conferences.

[13]  M. K. Swami,et al.  Polarized diffuse reflectance measurements on cancerous and noncancerous tissues , 2009, Journal of biophotonics.

[14]  Russell A. Chipman,et al.  Error analysis of a Mueller matrix polarimeter , 1990 .

[15]  Igor Meglinski,et al.  Online object oriented Monte Carlo computational tool for the needs of biomedical optics , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[16]  Geminiano Martínez-Ponce,et al.  Multispectral Stokes polarimetry for dermatoscopic imaging , 2015, SPIE/OSJ Biophotonics Japan.

[17]  R. Azzam,et al.  Stokes-vector and Mueller-matrix polarimetry [Invited]. , 2016, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  Razvigor Ossikovski,et al.  Analysis of depolarizing Mueller matrices through a symmetric decomposition. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  Dmitry A. Zimnyakov,et al.  Combining polarimetry and spectropolarimetry techniques in diagnostics of cancer changes in biological tissues , 2015, Other Conferences.

[20]  E. García-Caurel,et al.  Depolarizing Mueller matrices: how to decompose them? , 2008 .

[21]  Ekaterina Borisova,et al.  Multiwavelength polarimetry of gastrointestinal ex vivo tissues for tumor diagnostic improvement , 2019, International School on Quantum Electronics: Laser Physics and Applications.

[22]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Biomedical Optics: Principles and Imaging , 2007 .

[23]  Alexander A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Polarization Optics of Random Media , 2003 .

[24]  I. V. Meglinskiĭ,et al.  Analysis of the spatial distribution of detector sensitivity in a multilayer randomly inhomogeneous medium with strong light scattering and absorption by the Monte Carlo method , 2001 .

[25]  Maria Rosaria Antonelli,et al.  Use of Mueller polarimetric imaging for the staging of human colon cancer , 2011, BiOS.

[26]  R. Azzam,et al.  Photopolarimetric measurement of the Mueller matrix by Fourier analysis of a single detected signal. , 1978, Optics letters.

[27]  Dennis Goldstein,et al.  Polarized Light, Third Edition , 2010 .

[28]  Igor Meglinski,et al.  Peer-to-peer Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in topical applications of biomedical optics , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.