Building a Lego Wall: Sequential Action Selection

The present study draws together two distinct lines of enquiry into the selection and control of sequential action: motor sequence production and action selection in everyday tasks. Participants were asked to build 2 different Lego walls. The walls were designed to have hierarchical structures with shared and dissociated colors and spatial components. Participants built 1 wall at a time, under low and high load cognitive states. Selection times for correctly completed trials were measured using 3-dimensional motion tracking. The paradigm enabled precise measurement of the timing of actions, while using real objects to create an end product. The experiment demonstrated that action selection was slowed at decision boundary points, relative to boundaries where no between-wall decision was required. Decision points also affected selection time prior to the actual selection window. Dual-task conditions increased selection errors. Errors mostly occurred at boundaries between chunks and especially when these required decisions. The data support hierarchical control of sequenced behavior.

[1]  J. Reason.  Actions not as planned : The price of automatisation , 1979 .

[2]  P C Gordon,et al.  Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Eduard C. Groen,et al.  The stuff that motor chunks are made of: Spatial instead of motor representations? , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The use of memorised verbal scripts in the rehabilitation of action disorganisation syndrome , 2006, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[6]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Analogical Processes in Learning , 1980 .

[7]  T. Shallice,et al.  Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. , 2006, Psychological review.

[8]  M. Botvinick.  Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[10]  Gustavo A. Vázquez,et al.  Implicit sequence learning and contextual cueing do not compete for central cognitive resources. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J F Soechting,et al.  Kinematics of typing: parallel control of the two hands. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Lauren M. Bylsma,et al.  Distraction and action slips in an everyday task: Evidence for a dynamic representation of task context , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Evidence for a multistage model of practice in a sequential movement task. , 1999 .

[14]  W B Verwey,et al.  Concatenating familiar movement sequences: the versatile cognitive processor. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[15]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  R. Seidler,et al.  Age-related declines in visuospatial working memory correlate with deficits in explicit motor sequence learning. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Evidence for graded central processing resources in a sequential movement task , 2013, Psychological Research.

[18]  Steven A. Jax,et al.  The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy. , 2007, Human movement science.

[19]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning , 2011, Neuron.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Differential Recruitment of the Sensorimotor Putamen and Frontoparietal Cortex during Motor Chunking in Humans , 2012, Neuron.

[21]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  Action selection in complex routinized sequential behaviors. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  A. Gordon,et al.  Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. , 1984 .

[23]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  M Botvinick,et al.  Doing without schema hierarchies: A connectionist approach to routine sequential action and its pathology , 2000 .

[25]  Willem B Verwey,et al.  Distinct modes of executing movement sequences: reacting, associating, and chunking. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Michael W. Montgomery,et al.  The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: a case study , 1991 .

[27]  Matthew J. C. Crump,et al.  Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. Hierarchical Control of Cognitive Processes: the Case for Skilled Typewriting , 2022 .

[28]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  The Coding and Inter-Manual Transfer of Movement Sequences , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[29]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Comparing action disorganization syndrome and dual-task load on normal performance in everyday action tasks , 2009, Neurocase.

[30]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  Learning and production of movement sequences: behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives. , 2004, Human movement science.

[31]  Tony J. Prescott.  Action selection , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[32]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[33]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[34]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  The cognitive neuropsychology of everyday action and planning , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[35]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[36]  D. Plaut,et al.  Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. , 2004, Psychological review.

[37]  Elger L. Abrahamse,et al.  Cognitive Processing in New and Practiced Discrete Keying Sequences , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[38]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[39]  Debra J. Rose,et al.  Choosing between-movement sequences: Effect of response-choice similarity on the underlying programming operations. , 1988 .

[40]  Stefan Panzer,et al.  Inter-manual transfer and practice: coding of simple motor sequences. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[41]  Jonathan Vaughan,et al.  The posture-based motion planning framework: new findings related to object manipulation, moving around obstacles, moving in three spatial dimensions, and haptic tracking. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[42]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences. , 2006 .

[43]  W. B. Verwey,et al.  A Forthcoming Key Press Can Be Selected While Earlier Ones Are Executed. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[44]  Laurel J Buxbaum,et al.  Naturalistic action production following right hemisphere stroke , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Skill learning strengthens cortical representations of motor sequences , 2013, eLife.

[46]  G. Humphreys,et al.  The Role of Semantic Knowledge and Working Memory in Everyday Tasks , 2000, Brain and Cognition.