Impact of modelling approximations in supply chain analysis – an experimental study

This paper presents a study of the comparison of the quality of results obtained at different levels of detail using a supply chain simulation. Analysis of supply chain is typically carried out using aggregated information to maintain the level of complexity of the simulation model at a manageable level. Advances in simulation have provided the ability to build comprehensive (detailed), modular models. The quantitative effect of detailed modelling on the corresponding analysis is investigated in this paper. A three-echelon supply chain is analysed using simulation models of varying levels of detail. Using each of these models, four sets of intensive experiments are performed. The first experiment intends to test whether the supply chain dynamics themselves depend on the modelling accuracy that represents the supply chain. The second and third experiments are conducted to test whether the effectiveness of the strategies employed to reduce the supply chain dynamics vary depending on the type (different detail) of model representing the supply chain. In the fourth experiment, statistical techniques are employed to identify which modelling aspect has the most influence on the supply chain dynamics. It is found that the approximations used in modelling, such as delays and capacity, have more impact on the outcome of supply chain analysis than end customer demand. Evidence that both the basic problem (supply chain dynamics) and the solution (strategy to reduce the dynamics) are greatly influenced by the modelling accuracy are presented.

[1]  Sita Bhaskaran.  Simulation Analysis of a Manufacturing Supply Chain , 1998 .

[2]  Morris A. Cohen,et al.  The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains , 1998, Oper. Res..

[3]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  On the Stability of Supply Chains , 2002, Oper. Res..

[4]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[5]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  The application of filter theory to the study of supply chain dynamics , 1994 .

[6]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation modelling and analysis , 1991 .

[7]  Nicoleta S. Tipi,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of supply chains , 2000, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[8]  Ihsan Sabuncuoglu,et al.  Simulation metamodelling with neural networks: An experimental investigation , 2002 .

[9]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Distributed supply chain simulation in a DEVS/CORBA execution environment , 1999, WSC '99.

[10]  Boonserm Kulvatunyou,et al.  Investigation of influence of modeling fidelities on supply chain dynamics , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[11]  Young-Jun Son,et al.  Distributed simulation: an enabling technology for the evaluation of virtual enterprises , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[12]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[13]  D. Lambert,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities , 1998 .

[14]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Distributed simulation with incorporated APS procedures for high-fidelity supply chain optimization , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[15]  Young-Jun Son,et al.  Design and development of a prototype distributed simulation for evaluation of supply chains , 2004 .

[16]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Material Management in Decentralized Supply Chains , 1993, Oper. Res..

[17]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Smoothing Supply Chain Dynamics , 1991 .

[18]  Charles R. McLean,et al.  The IMS MISSION architecture for distributed manufacturing simulation , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[19]  Victoria C. P. Chen,et al.  Performance analysis of conjoined supply chains , 2001 .

[20]  John Ladbrook,et al.  GRIDS-SCF: An Infrastructure for Distributed Supply Chain Simulation , 2002, Simul..

[21]  Chu-Cheow Lim,et al.  Criticality of detailed modeling in semiconductor supply chain simulation , 1999, WSC'99. 1999 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings. 'Simulation - A Bridge to the Future' (Cat. No.99CH37038).

[22]  B. Yu,et al.  Metamodels in manufacturing: a review , 1994 .

[23]  Gregory R. Clay.  Venture launch: use of simulation to support strategic operational decisions , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[24]  Sreeram Ramakrishnan,et al.  A Real-time Simulation-Based Control Architecture for Supply Chain Interactions , 2002 .

[25]  M. Naim,et al.  Supply chain dynamics , 1991 .

[26]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[27]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Development of a high-level supply chain simulation model , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[28]  Catherine M. Harmonosky,et al.  Investigating the application potential of simulation to real-time control decisions , 1995 .