Aphasia, language, and theory of mind
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Saxe,et al. Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[2] M. Siegal,et al. Where to look first for children's knowledge of false beliefs , 1991, Cognition.
[3] G. Green. Communication in aphasia therapy: some of the procedures and issues involved. , 1984, The British journal of disorders of communication.
[4] H. Brownell,et al. Acquired `theory of mind' impairments following stroke , 1999, Cognition.
[5] M. Tomasello,et al. Unwilling versus unable: infants' understanding of intentional action. , 2005, Developmental psychology.
[6] Paul Ekman,et al. Lie detection and language comprehension , 2000, Nature.
[7] R. Joseph,et al. Intention and knowledge in preschoolers' conception of pretend. , 1998, Child development.
[8] Michael Siegal,et al. Theory of Mind and Pragmatic Understanding Following Right Hemisphere Damage , 1996, Brain and Language.
[9] Josef Perner,et al. Want that is understood well before say that, think that, and false belief: a test of de Villiers's linguistic determinism on German-speaking children. , 2003, Child development.
[10] D. Zaitchik,et al. When representations conflict with reality: The preschooler's problem with false beliefs and “false” photographs , 1990, Cognition.
[11] H. Wellman,et al. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. , 2001, Child development.
[12] P. Harris,et al. Language and Children's Understanding of Mental States , 2005 .
[13] Carl Ludy,et al. Is problem solving dependent on language? , 2005, Brain and Language.
[14] R. Baillargeon,et al. Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs? , 2005, Science.
[15] Y. Joanette,et al. Production and Evaluation of Requests by Right Hemisphere Brain-Damaged Individuals , 1994, Brain and Language.
[16] Michael Siegal,et al. Language and thought: the fundamental significance of conversational awareness for cognitive development , 1999 .
[17] P. Carruthers. The cognitive functions of language , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[18] A. Leslie. Developmental parallels in understanding minds and bodies , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[19] A. Leslie,et al. Competence and performance in false belief understanding: A comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children. , 1999 .
[20] Thomas Suddendorf,et al. The Rise of the Metamind , 1997 .
[21] Michael Siegal,et al. Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient , 2000, Current Biology.
[22] P. Bloom,et al. Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind , 2000, Cognition.
[23] Herbert H. Clark,et al. Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
[24] J. Astington,et al. A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. , 1999, Developmental psychology.
[25] F. Keil,et al. Thinking Through Language , 2001 .
[26] J Aharon-Peretz,et al. Impaired “Affective Theory of Mind” Is Associated with Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage , 2005, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.
[27] L. Mo,et al. Relative roles of general and complementation language in theory-of-mind development: evidence from Cantonese and English. , 2004, Child development.
[28] Skye McDonald,et al. Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders , 2003, Brain and Language.
[29] A. Caramazza,et al. The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future's past and some future directions , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[30] Stephen C. Want,et al. Severe Impairment in Grammar Does Not Preclude Theory of Mind , 2001, Neurocase.
[31] J. Stevenson. The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution , 2001 .
[32] B. Bara,et al. Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients , 2006, Brain and Language.
[33] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Frontal and Temporo-Parietal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind: Neuropsychological Evidence from a False-Belief Task with Reduced Language and Executive Demands , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[34] Jennie E. Pyers,et al. Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding , 2002 .
[35] D. Stuss,et al. The frontal lobes are necessary for 'theory of mind'. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[36] Katherine Nelson,et al. Entering a Community of Minds: An Experiential Approach to ‘Theory of Mind’ , 2003, Human Development.
[37] L M Parsons,et al. New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.
[38] L. Gleitman,et al. [Language and thought]. , 1991, La Revue du praticien.
[39] J. Perner,et al. Infants' Insight into the Mind: How Deep? , 2005, Science.
[40] 小羽 俊士,et al. Wisconsin card sorting test , 2013 .
[41] G. Csibra,et al. Evidence for infants' understanding of false beliefs should not be dismissed , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[42] J. Perner,et al. Do infants really understand false belief? Response to Leslie , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[43] M. A. Defeyter,et al. Competence and performance in belief-desire reasoning across two cultures: The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about false belief? , 2006, Cognition.
[44] W L Custer,et al. A comparison of young children's understanding of contradictory representations in pretense, memory, and belief. , 1996, Child development.
[45] H. Wimmer,et al. Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit , 1987 .
[46] L. Surian,et al. Sources of Performance on Theory of Mind Tasks in Right Hemisphere-Damaged Patients , 2001, Brain and Language.
[47] H. H. Clark. Arenas of language use , 1993 .
[48] Ori Friedman,et al. Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’ , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[49] Dana Samson,et al. Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[50] M. Siegal. Knowing Children: Experiments in Conversation and Cognition , 1991 .
[51] Michael Siegal,et al. Signposts to development: theory of mind in deaf children. , 2002, Child development.
[52] Michael Siegal,et al. Agrammatic but numerate. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[53] L. Surian,et al. Conversational Understanding in Young Children , 2008 .
[54] S. Baron-Cohen,et al. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.
[55] M. Siegal,et al. Neural systems involved in 'theory of mind' , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[56] Michael Siegal,et al. Mind over grammar: reasoning in aphasia and development , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[57] Kim Sterelny,et al. From mating to mentality: evaluating evolutionary psychology , 2003 .
[58] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Testing the domain-specificity of a theory of mind deficit in brain-injured patients: Evidence for consistent performance on non-verbal, “reality-unknown” false belief and false photograph tasks , 2007, Cognition.