The inverse plurality rule—an axiomatization
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dominique Lepelley,et al. The vulnerability of four social choice functions to coalitional manipulation of preferences , 1994 .
[2] Roger B. Myerson,et al. Comparison of Scoring Rules in Poisson Voting Games , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.
[3] Peter C. Fishburn,et al. Axioms for approval voting: Direct proof , 1978 .
[4] D. Lepelley,et al. Choix social positionnel et principe majoritaire , 1998 .
[5] Shmuel Nitzan,et al. Ameliorating Majority Decisiveness through Expression of Preference Intensity , 2002, American Political Science Review.
[6] H. Young. Social Choice Scoring Functions , 1975 .
[7] Vincent C. H. Chua,et al. Analytical representation of probabilities under the IAC condition , 2000, Soc. Choice Welf..
[8] D. J Hartfiel,et al. A characterization result for the plurality rule , 1978 .
[9] D. Saari. Basic Geometry of Voting , 1995 .
[10] Zvika Neeman,et al. Robustness against inefficient manipulation , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..
[11] Douglas Muzzio,et al. APPROVAL VOTING , 1983 .
[12] Harold See,et al. Justice and Equity , 2019, Ancient Legal Thought.
[13] Yongsheng Xu,et al. Independent necessary and sufficient conditions for approval voting , 1991 .
[14] M. Remzi Sanver. Scoring rules cannot respect majority in choice and elimination simultaneously , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..
[15] H. Moulin. The strategy of social choice , 1983 .