To evaluate interface usability of an e-course platform: User perspective

As a core term in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), the analysis of system usability continues to be one of priority focuses of HCI researchers. Through users’ evaluation, a system’s inherent problems can be learned and its design be improved. This research was conducted to obtain the overall evaluation from the participants over the e-Course platform based on the data gathered from questionnaires, interviews and scenario simulations. This study recruited five participants, three of whom were professors and the rest were teacher’s assistant. We used nine constructs to evaluate interface usability of the system. The research results showed that the average scores of three scenarios from high to low were S1a, S1b and S2. In terms of usability goals, efficiency, learn ability, utility, effectiveness, their average score is high than 3. In terms of user’s experiences goals, the average score is less then 3, but near to 3. Overall, the interface of e-Course platform is ease to use and acceptable. Finally, we organized interview results and provided nine suggestions for a director of computer department and system designer. These suggestions can let them to know about the priority of system improvement, and provide a useful reference for practice.   Key words: System usability, usability goals, user experience goals, human-computer interaction, user perspective.

[1]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  James R. Lewis Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies , 2002 .

[3]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  Implicit Methods in Social Psychology. , 2004 .

[4]  Jeffrey Rubin,et al.  Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests , 1994 .

[5]  Juan Ramón Pérez Pérez,et al.  Adaptation in current e-learning systems , 2008, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[6]  G. M. Alam,et al.  Who gains from brain and body drain business -developing/developed world or individuals: A comparative study between skilled and semi/unskilled emigrants , 2010 .

[7]  John E. Mullens VALIDATING ITEM RESPONSES ON SELF-REPORT TEACHER SURVEYS , 2002 .

[8]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Research Paper: Impact of Clinical Reminder Redesign on Learnability, Efficiency, Usability, and Workload for Ambulatory Clinic Nurses , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[10]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Dan Jong Kim,et al.  The Effects of Different Presentation Modalities on a Person Identification Task: A Study of Wireless Multimedia PDA Use in a Security Context , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[13]  Teresa Roselli,et al.  Usability of E-learning tools , 2004, AVI.

[14]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[15]  Gazi Mahabubul Alam,et al.  The role of science and technology education at network age population for sustainable development of Bangladesh through human resource advancement , 2009 .

[16]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[17]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  Task-technology fit and user acceptance of online auction , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers’ educational technology practices , 2007 .

[19]  Ron Henderson,et al.  Perceived usefulness, ease of use and electronic supermarket use , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  A. T. Panter,et al.  The SAGE andbook of methods in social psychology , 2004 .

[21]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  J. Nielsen Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[23]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Saedah Siraj,et al.  Information and communication technology for participatory based decision-making-E-management for administrative efficiency in Higher Education , 2010 .

[26]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[28]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  What makes learning networks effective? , 2002, CACM.

[29]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  Yeliz Yesilada,et al.  What input errors do you experience? Typing and pointing errors of mobile Web users , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..