The Effectiveness of Tactical Communication and Protection Systems (TCAPS) on Minimizing Hearing Hazard and Maintaining Auditory Situational Awareness

In military environments, maintaining Auditory Situational Awareness (ASA) and providing protection from hearing hazard are often dueling priorities. Traditional passive hearing protection devices (HPD’s) can provide adequate protection to the soldier from impulsive and continuous noise hazards, but this can come at the cost of reduced ASA. Anecdotal reports indicate that many soldiers may forego HPD use entirely in an attempt to maximize ASA. However, unprotected ears can lead to temporary threshold shifts (TTS) and permanent threshold shifts (PTS) that can be much worse for ASA than HPD use. Tactical Communication and Hearing Protection Systems (TCAPS) are active electronic systems that can provide a potential solution to this problem by giving the soldier protection, environmental hearing and radio communications. This paper discusses evaluating the effectiveness of these systems through objective measures of attenuation and subject human sound localization.

[1]  Nathaniel T. Greene,et al.  Effects of Active and Passive Hearing Protection Devices on Sound Source Localization, Speech Recognition, and Tone Detection , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  S. Abel,et al.  Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[3]  L. Marks,et al.  Post-transient shifts in auditory lateralization: effects of target level. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Nancy L. Vause,et al.  Effects of Earplugs and Protective Headgear on Auditory Localization Ability in the Horizontal Plane , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Angelique A Scharine,et al.  Evaluation of Variants of 3M Peltor ComTAC Tactical Communication and Protection System (TCAPS) Headsets: Measures of Hearing Protection and Auditory Performance , 2013 .

[6]  Angelique A. Scharine Degradation of Auditory Localization Performance Due to Helmet Ear Coverage: The Effects of Normal Acoustic Reverberation , 2009 .

[7]  W G Noble,et al.  Theoretical and practical implications of the effects of hearing protection devices on localization ability. , 1972, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  G. Atherley,et al.  Effect of ear-defenders (ear-muffs) on the localization of sound , 1970, British journal of industrial medicine.

[9]  John G Casali,et al.  Warfighter auditory situation awareness: Effects of augmented hearing protection/enhancement devices and TCAPS for military ground combat applications , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[10]  Angelique A Scharine,et al.  Helmet Electronics & Display System-Upgradeable Protection (HEaDS-UP) Phase III Assessment: Headgear Effects on Auditory Perception , 2013 .

[11]  Timothy Mermagen,et al.  Sound localisation ability of soldiers wearing infantry ACH and PASGT helmets , 2014, Ergonomics.

[12]  P. Gerhardstein,et al.  Change deafness for real spatialized environmental scenes , 2017, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[13]  Elliott H. Berger,et al.  Experience with a new ANSI standard for measuring the real‐ear attenuation (REAT) of hearing protectors (S12.6‐1997) , 1999 .