Managing changes in the environment of human–robot interaction and welfare services
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] O. Tuisku,et al. Decision-makers’ attitudes toward the use of care robots in welfare services , 2022, AI & SOCIETY.
[2] Reza Etemad-Sajadi,et al. How Ethical Issues Raised by Human–Robot Interaction can Impact the Intention to use the Robot? , 2022, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[3] Jingyao Wang,et al. Machine learning-based human-robot interaction in ITS , 2022, Inf. Process. Manag..
[4] Manish Mohan Baral,et al. Service robots are an option for contactless services due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the hotels , 2021, DECISION.
[5] Eduard Fosch-Villaronga,et al. On Healthcare Robots: Concepts, definitions, and considerations for healthcare robot governance , 2021, ArXiv.
[6] Yan Luximon,et al. The face of trust: The effect of robot face ratio on consumer preference , 2021, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[7] Christoph Lutz,et al. Overtrusting robots: Setting a research agenda to mitigate overtrust in automation , 2021, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.
[8] O. Tuisku,et al. Embedding care robots into society and practice: Socio-technical considerations , 2020 .
[9] O. Tuisku,et al. My business or not? The perspective of technology companies on shifting towards care robotics , 2020, European Planning Studies.
[10] Kirsten Thommes,et al. Care Robot Orientation: What, Who and How? Potential Users’ Perceptions , 2020, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[11] Satu Pekkarinen,et al. Could robots strengthen the sense of autonomy of older people residing in assisted living facilities?—A future-oriented study , 2019, Ethics and Information Technology.
[12] Ville Kyrki,et al. Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions , 2019, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[13] Eduard Fosch Villaronga,et al. Gathering Expert Opinions for Social Robots’ Ethical, Legal, and Societal Concerns: Findings from Four International Workshops , 2019, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[14] O. Tuisku,et al. Robotics in Finnish welfare services: dynamics in an emerging innovation ecosystem , 2019, European Planning Studies.
[15] Sven Nyholm,et al. Robots in the Workplace: a Threat to—or Opportunity for—Meaningful Work? , 2019, Philosophy & Technology.
[16] Ann Blandford,et al. HCI for health and wellbeing: Challenges and opportunities , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[17] S. Laulainen,et al. Challenges for Management in Implementing Reforms at the Ministry Level and in Health and Social Service Organizations in Finland , 2019, Administrative Sciences.
[18] Satu Pekkarinen,et al. Welfare state transition in the making: Focus on the niche-regime interaction in Finnish elderly care services , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[19] Kirsten Thommes,et al. Improved Knowledge Changes the Mindset: Older Adults' Perceptions of Care Robots , 2019, HCI.
[20] Mirva Hyypiä,et al. Elderly Care and Digital Services: Toward a Sustainable Sociotechnical Transition , 2019, Translational Systems Sciences.
[21] Tuuli Turja,et al. Care Workers’ Readiness for Robotization: Identifying Psychological and Socio-Demographic Determinants , 2019, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[22] Outi Tuisku,et al. "Robots do not replace a nurse with a beating heart" , 2019, Inf. Technol. People.
[23] T. Rantanen,et al. Care Personnel's Attitudes and Fears Toward Care Robots in Elderly Care: A Comparison of Data from the Care Personnel in Finland and Japan. , 2018, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.
[24] Michael A. Goodrich,et al. The Science of Human-Robot Interaction , 2018, HRI 2018.
[25] Tuomo Särkikoski,et al. Finnish healthcare professionals' attitudes towards robots: Reflections on a population sample , 2018, Nursing open.
[26] Luis Romero,et al. An optimization design proposal of automated guided vehicles for mixed type transportation in hospital environments , 2017, PloS one.
[27] René Szotkowski,et al. Selected aspects of conditions in the use of new media as an important part of the training of teachers in the Czech Republic and Poland - differences, risks and threats , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.
[28] Wan Ling Chang,et al. Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social Robots: Mutual Learning with Older Adults with Depression , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.
[29] Andrea Nelson,et al. Educators in Search of the Fine Line between Use and Misuse of New Technologies , 2017, Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina.
[30] S. Cummings,et al. Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management , 2016 .
[31] Jane Hendy,et al. The importance of role sending in the sensemaking of change agent roles. , 2015, Journal of health organization and management.
[32] Pradeep Kumar Ray,et al. Emerging ICT implementation issues in aged care , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[33] Aimee Van Wynsberghe,et al. Healthcare Robots: Ethics, Design and Implementation , 2015 .
[34] Sandra Bedaf,et al. Overview and Categorization of Robots Supporting Independent Living of Elderly People: What Activities Do They Support and How Far Have They Developed , 2015, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.
[35] Alexander Peine,et al. Science, technology and the ‘grand challenge’ of ageing—Understanding the socio-material constitution of later life , 2015 .
[36] Louis Neven,et al. By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home , 2015 .
[37] Florian Kohlbacher,et al. The limits of participatory technology development: The case of service robots in care facilities for older people , 2015 .
[38] Guy Michaels,et al. Robots at Work , 2015, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[39] Cornelius Herstatt,et al. The emergence of care robotics — A patent and publication analysis , 2015 .
[40] Zoe Radnor,et al. Operationalizing Co-Production in Public Services Delivery: The contribution of service blueprinting , 2014 .
[41] S. Elo,et al. Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .
[42] Mirva Hyypiä,et al. Roles of leadership in complex environments : Enhancing Knowledge Flows in Organisational Constellations through Practice-Based Innovation Processes , 2013 .
[43] Jacqueline Cramer,et al. Change agent sensemaking for sustainability in a multinational subsidiary , 2012 .
[44] Enrique Fernández-Macías,et al. Job Polarization in Europe? Changes in the Employment Structure and Job Quality, 1995-2007 , 2012 .
[45] N. Sharkey,et al. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.
[46] Shannon Vallor. Carebots and Caregivers: Sustaining the Ethical Ideal of Care in the Twenty-First Century , 2011, Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics.
[47] Vipul R. Patel,et al. History of robotic surgery , 2010, Journal of robotic surgery.
[48] P. Varkey,et al. Change Management for Effective Quality Improvement: A Primer , 2010, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.
[49] J. Kotter. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.
[50] Woong Youn Chung,et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.
[51] Gang Peng,et al. Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow , 2008, J. Knowl. Manag..
[52] Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al. Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field , 2007 .
[53] H. Melkas,et al. Impact of safety alarm systems on care personnel , 2007 .
[54] Robert Sparrow,et al. In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.
[55] S. Oreg. Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change , 2006 .
[56] Takanori Shibata,et al. Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
[57] Veronica Hope Hailey,et al. Managing Change across Boundaries: Boundary-Shaking Practices , 2005 .
[58] Sebastian Thrun,et al. Toward a Framework for Human-Robot Interaction , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[59] E. Rogers,et al. Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.
[60] F. Geels. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .
[61] J. Kotter,et al. The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations , 2002 .
[62] Stephen G. Green,et al. Leadership self‐efficacy and managers' motivation for leading change , 2002 .
[63] Peter A. Todd,et al. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..
[64] K. Lewin. Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .
[65] Gavriel Salvendy,et al. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for the Elderly and Technology Acceptance , 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[66] Satu Pekkarinen,et al. Digitalisation in Health Care and Elderly Care Services: From Potholes to Innovation Opportunities , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Soc. Chang..
[67] Martin Fischer,et al. Service Robotics and Human Labor: A first technology assessment of substitution and cooperation , 2017, Robotics Auton. Syst..
[68] Marketta Niemelä,et al. Expectations and experiences of adopting robots in elderly care in Finland: perspectives of caregivers and decision-makers , 2016 .
[69] Frank MacCrory,et al. Identifying the Multiple Skills in Skill-Biased Technical Change , 2015, ICIS.
[70] Helinä Melkas,et al. Innovative assistive technology in Finnish public elderly-care services: a focus on productivity. , 2013, Work.
[71] H. Tohidi,et al. Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .
[72] N. Malanowski. Matching Demand and Supply: Future Technologies for Active Ageing in Europe , 2008 .
[73] O. Bokhove. Autonomous systems , 2006 .
[74] J. Kotter,et al. Choosing strategies for change. , 1979, Harvard business review.