External Evaluation, Task Difficulty, and Continuing Motivation

AbstractTwo-hundred fifty (250) fifth graders participated in this study of the effects of evaluation condition and task difficulty on motivation to return to an initial task. Two levels of difficulty (hard, easy) on the task were crossed with two levels of evaluation (teacher, self). Continuing motivation was measured both immediately after the initial task and two weeks later. Significant differences were obtained only on the immediate measure. The proportion of subjects returning to task was significantly higher under the easy version (.55) of the initial task than under the hard version (.40). This difference was due almost entirely to a much lower return rate under the hard task and teacher evaluation (.27) than under any other combination of conditions. Significant between-school differences were interpreted as indicating a consistent motivational effect related to reported expectations for achievement within each school. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for classroom practice.

[1]  J. Diggory.  Self-evaluation: concepts and studies , 1966 .

[2]  H. Walberg,et al.  Continuing Motivation in Science for Early and Late Adolescents , 1981 .

[3]  T. Pittman,et al.  School experience, reward characteristics, and intrinsic motivation. , 1982 .

[4]  Michael Rutter,et al.  School Effects on Pupil Progress: Research Findings and Policy Implications. , 1983 .

[5]  Ronald R. Edmonds.  Effective Schools for the Urban Poor , 1979 .

[6]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. , 1973 .

[7]  Robert Folger,et al.  When rewards reflect competence: A qualification of the overjustification effect. , 1980 .

[8]  John W. Atkinson,et al.  A theory of achievement motivation , 1966 .

[9]  D. Ruble,et al.  Competence and the overjustification effect: A developmental study. , 1979 .

[10]  S. Harter.  Pleasure Derived from Challenge and the Effects of Receiving Grades on Children's Difficulty Level Choices. , 1978 .

[11]  B. Weiner,et al.  A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. , 1979, Journal of educational psychology.

[12]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[13]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. , 1981 .

[14]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance1 , 1971 .

[15]  H. J. Arnold,et al.  Effects of performance feedback and extrinsic reward upon high intrinsic motivation , 1976 .

[16]  E. Deci.  Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. , 1971 .

[17]  M. Maehr,et al.  A Further Consideration of the Effects of Evaluation on Motivation1 , 1976 .

[18]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Turning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children's intrinsic motivation. , 1975 .

[19]  D. Bem.  Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[20]  William M. Stallings,et al.  Freedom from External Evaluation. , 1972 .

[21]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Martin L. Maehr,et al.  Toward the experimental analysis of continuing motivation. , 1976 .

[23]  E. Deci.  INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, EXTRINSIC REINFORCEMENT, AND INEQUITY , 1972 .

[24]  M. Maehr.  Continuing Motivation: An Analysis of a Seldom Considered Educational Outcome , 1976 .

[25]  M. Weiner,et al.  The effects of reward and perception of competency upon intrinsic motivation , 1978 .