Modeling Dependencies in International Relations Networks

Despite the desire to focus on the interconnected nature of politics and economics at the global scale, most empirical studies in the field of international relations assume not only that the major actors are sovereign, but also that their relationships are portrayed in data that are modeled as independent phenomena. In contrast, this article illustrates the use of linear and bilinear random—effects models to represent statistical dependencies that often characterize dyadic data such as international relations. In particular, we show how to estimate models for dyadic data that simultaneously take into account: (a) regressor variables, (b) correlation of actions having the same actor, (c) correlation of actions having the same target, (d) correlation of actions between a pair of actors (i.e., reciprocity of actions), and (e) third-order dependencies, such as transitivity, clustering, and balance. We apply this new approach to the political relations among a wide range of political actors in Central Asia over the period 1989–1999, illustrating the presence and strength of second- and third-order statistical dependencies in these data.

[1]  I. Politische Geographie , 1912 .

[2]  Bausteine zur Geopolitik , 1928 .

[3]  John H. Herz Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma , 1950, World Politics.

[4]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[5]  Dina A. Zinnes,et al.  Content Analysis: A Handbook with Applications for the Study of International Crisis. , 1964 .

[6]  Dina A. Zinnes An Analytical Study of the Balance of Power Theories , 1967 .

[7]  K. Gabriel,et al.  Least Squares Approximation of Matrices by Additive and Multiplicative Models , 1978 .

[8]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A New Round Robin Analysis of Variance for Social Interaction Data , 1979 .

[9]  E. Azar The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project , 1980 .

[10]  G. Y. Wong,et al.  ROUND ROBIN ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE VIA MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD , 1981 .

[11]  G. Y. Wong Round Robin Analysis of Variance via Maximum Likelihood , 1982 .

[12]  Reexamining Spatial Models of International Conflicts , 1987 .

[13]  Joshua S. Goldstein A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data , 1992 .

[14]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  NORMATIVE AND STRUCTURAL CAUSES OF DEMOCRATIC PEACE , 1993 .

[15]  Zeev Maoz,et al.  Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986 , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Stuart A. Bremer,et al.  Democracy and militarized interstate conflict, 1816–1965 , 1993 .

[17]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[18]  Philip A. Schrodt,et al.  MACHINE CODING OF EVENT DATA USING REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SOURCES , 1994 .

[19]  L. Mark Berliner,et al.  Subsampling the Gibbs Sampler , 1994 .

[20]  Philip A. Schrodt,et al.  Political Science: KEDS—A Program for the Machine Coding of Event Data , 1994 .

[21]  David Lai A structural approach to alignment: A case study of the China‐Soviet‐U.S. strategic triangle, 1971–1988 , 1995 .

[22]  Reinhard Wolf,et al.  Democratization and the Danger of War , 1995 .

[23]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[24]  Erik Gartzke,et al.  Political System Similarity And The Choice of Allies , 1996 .

[25]  J. Wilkenfeld,et al.  A Study of Crisis , 1997 .

[26]  M. Mousseau Democracy and Militarized Interstate Collaboration , 1997 .

[27]  K. Gabriel,et al.  Generalised bilinear regression , 1998 .

[28]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[29]  Bruce Russett,et al.  The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–85 , 1998, International Organization.

[30]  Curtis S. Signorino Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[31]  Alastair Smith,et al.  Testing theories of strategic choice: The example of crisis escalation , 1999 .

[32]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Yoon and Kim , 2000 .

[33]  B. Russett,et al.  Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations , 2000 .

[34]  A Cross-Validation of Bueno de Mesquita and Lalman's International Interaction Game , 2000, British Journal of Political Science.

[35]  V. Bakthavatsalam,et al.  Windows of opportunity , 2001 .

[36]  P. S. Gill,et al.  Statistical analyses for round robin interaction data , 2001 .

[37]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon , 2001, International Organization.

[38]  T. Snijders,et al.  Estimation and Prediction for Stochastic Blockstructures , 2001 .

[39]  Michael D. Ward,et al.  Measuring Space: A Minimum-Distance Database and Applications to International Studies , 2001 .

[40]  Kristian Skrede Gleditsch,et al.  All International Politics is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization , 2002 .

[41]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis , 2002 .

[42]  Andrew D. Martin,et al.  Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 , 2002, Political Analysis.

[43]  Michael D. Ward,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Window Subseries Empirical Variance Estimators in International Relations , 2002, Political Analysis.

[44]  A. Przeworski,et al.  A Statistical Model of Bilateral Cooperation , 2002, Political Analysis.

[45]  E. Loken,et al.  A UNIFIED THEORY OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND INFERENCE FOR VARIANCE COMPONENT MODELS FOR DYADIC DATA , 2002 .

[46]  Modeling through group invariance: an interesting example with potential applications , 2002 .

[47]  B. Leeds Do Alliances Deter Aggression? The Influence of Military Alliances on the Initiation of Militarized Interstate Disputes , 2003 .

[48]  Peter D. Hoff Random Effects Models for Network Data , 2003 .

[49]  J. Hewitt Dyadic Processes and International Crises , 2003 .

[50]  Bruce Russett,et al.  Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992 , 2003 .

[51]  Curtis S. Signorino Structure and Uncertainty in Discrete Choice Models , 2003, Political Analysis.

[52]  Michael D. Ward,et al.  Identifying International Networks : Latent Spaces and Imputation , 2003 .

[53]  Virginia Haufler Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[54]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers , 2004 .

[55]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Bilinear Mixed-Effects Models for Dyadic Data , 2005 .

[56]  Philip A. Schrodt Forecasting Conflict in the Balkans using Hidden Markov Models , 2006 .