The power of numbers in strategizing

This article draws on a detailed case study of a complex decision process in a public healthcare system to consider the role and potential power of numbers in strategizing. Because of their association with precision and accuracy, numbers may seem at first sight to be unlikely tools for decision making in contexts characterized by ambiguous goals and diffuse authority.Yet in the case described in this article, managers successfully mobilized a system of numbers to make an extremely controversial strategic decision.The empirical study examines in depth the micro-practices and processes by which the objectivity and legitimacy of a transparently contestable system of numbers were socially constructed in a public forum. By developing a system whose results mapped on to dominant values and interests, by displaying transparency, consistency and competence in defence of the system, and by organizing the decision process in a way that disempowered adversaries, the pro tagonists in the case were able to infuse a difficult decision with positive value. It is concluded that the power of numbers lies in their ability to fill the strategic void created by pluralism.Though contested, numbers can under certain conditions come to acquire and provide authority in organizations where power is diffuse.This is most likely when the number systems enable the reconciliation of diverse values and interests, when they are embedded in shared systems of meaning, and when they are coupled with and activated by particular micro-practices that support the legitimacy of their promoters as disinterested advocates for the collective good.

[1]  Michel Callon,et al.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation , 2007 .

[2]  J. Crisp.  Ladder of success. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[3]  Alan D. Lowe,et al.  Emergent Strategy and the Measurement of Performance: The Formulation of Performance Indicators at the Microlevel , 2004 .

[4]  A. Lowe.  Postsocial relations: towards a performative view of accounting knowledge , 2004 .

[5]  M. Power.  Counting, Control and Calculation: Reflections on Measuring and Management , 2004 .

[6]  Steven P. Feldman.  The Culture of Objectivity: Quantification, Uncertainty, and the Evaluation of Risk at NASA , 2004 .

[7]  Jean-Pascal Gond,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry , 2004 .

[8]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  Measuring Nothing: The Case of the Greek National Health System , 2004 .

[9]  David J. Cooper,et al.  Performance Measures and the Rationalization of Organizations , 2003 .

[10]  Joni J. Young.  Constructing, persuading and silencing: the rhetoric of accounting standards , 2003 .

[11]  Michael Power,et al.  Auditing and the production of legitimacy , 2003 .

[12]  Sue Llewellyn,et al.  The 'Ladder of Success' in Healthcare: The UK National Reference Costing Index , 2003 .

[13]  S. Llewellyn,et al.  Challenges in costing health care services , 2002 .

[14]  T. Ahrens,et al.  The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: day-to-day contests of accountability in a U.K. restaurant chain , 2002 .

[15]  Salvador Carmona,et al.  The relationship between accounting and spatial practices in the factory , 2002 .

[16]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  Researching Organizational Discourse , 2001 .

[17]  A. Lowe.  "Action at a distance":accounting inscriptions and the reporting of episodes of clinical care , 2001 .

[18]  S. Harrison.  Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice , 2001 .

[19]  A. Lowe,et al.  The construction of a network at Health Waikato. The "towards clinical budgeting" project. , 2000, Journal of management in medicine.

[20]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Reflecting on the Strategy Process , 1999 .

[21]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Accounting for Teamwork: A Critical Study of Group-Based Systems of Organizational Control. , 1998 .

[22]  Neil Fligstein.  The politics of quantification , 1998 .

[23]  R. Gephart.  Hazardous measures: an interpretive textual analysis of quantitative sensemaking during crises , 1997 .

[24]  T. Porter,et al.  Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life , 1996 .

[25]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Does Decision Process Matter? A Study Of Strategic Decision-making Effectiveness , 1996 .

[26]  M. J. Fischer,et al.  "Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study , 1996 .

[27]  Ann Langley,et al.  Between 'Paralysis by Analysis' and 'Extinction by Instinct' , 1995 .

[28]  Sue Llewellyn,et al.  Managing the Boundary , 1994 .

[29]  P. C. Nutt.  Making strategic choices , 2002 .

[30]  James W. Dean,et al.  The Relationship between Procedural Rationality and Political Behavior in Strategic Decision Making , 1993 .

[31]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Getting comfortable with the numbers: Auditing and the micro-production of macro-order , 1993 .

[32]  James B. Thomas,et al.  INFORMATION PROCESSING IN STRATEGIC ALLIANCE BUILDING: A MULTIPLE‐CASE APPROACH* , 1993 .

[33]  James W. Dean,et al.  PROCEDURAL RATIONALITY IN THE STRATEGIC DECISION‐MAKING PROCESS* , 1993 .

[34]  Mark W. Dirsmith,et al.  Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: An extended institutional theory perspective , 1993 .

[35]  Keith Robson,et al.  ACCOUNTING NUMBERS AS 'INSCRIPTION': ACTION AT A DISTANCE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING. , 1992 .

[36]  N. Rose.  Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy☆ , 1991 .

[37]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[38]  A Langley,et al.  In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. , 1989, Administrative science quarterly.

[39]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[40]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[41]  Janine Nahapiet.  The rhetoric and reality of an accounting change: A study of resource allocation , 1988 .

[42]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[43]  A. Hopwood,et al.  The archeology of accounting systems , 1987 .

[44]  J. Fredrickson.  The Strategic Decision Process and Organizational Structure , 1986 .

[45]  Nils Brunsson.  The Irrational Organization: Irrationality as a Basis for Organizational Action and Change , 1985 .

[46]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[47]  A. D. Meyer,et al.  Mingling decision making metaphors. , 1984, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[48]  Nils Brunsson.  THE IRRATIONALITY OF ACTION AND ACTION RATIONALITY: DECISIONS, IDEOLOGIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIONS , 1982 .

[49]  Sam D. Sieber.  Fatal Remedies: The Ironies of Social Intervention , 1981 .

[50]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[51]  S. Ranson.  The Structuring of Organizational Structures. , 1980 .

[52]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving , 1979 .

[53]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[54]  A. J. Meltsner,et al.  Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. , 1977 .

[55]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[56]  J. L. Bower.  Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment , 1970 .

[57]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  Comparative Studies in Administration. , 1960 .

[58]  M. Dalton,et al.  Men Who Manage: Fusions of Feeling and Theory in Administration. , 1960 .

[59]  J. Thompson,et al.  Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decision , 1959 .