Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing

SUMMARY In the present study, a computational investigation was carried out to understand the influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing. A flexible, two-dimensional, two-link model moving within a viscous fluid was considered. The Navier–Stokes equations governing the fluid dynamics were solved together with the equations governing the structural dynamics by using a strongly coupled fluid–structure interaction scheme. Harmonic kinematics was used to prescribe the motions of one of the links, thus effectively reducing the wing to a single degree-of-freedom oscillator. The wing's flexibility was characterized by the ratio of the flapping frequency to the natural frequency of the structure. Apart from the rigid case, different values of this frequency ratio (only in the range of 1/2 to 1/6) were considered at the Reynolds numbers of 75, 250 and 1000. It was found that flexibility can enhance aerodynamic performance and that the best performance is realized when the wing is excited by a non-linear resonance at 1/3 of the natural frequency. Specifically, at Reynolds numbers of 75, 250 and 1000, the aerodynamic performance that is characterized by the ratio of lift coefficient to drag coefficient is respectively increased by 28%, 23% and 21% when compared with the corresponding ratios of a rigid wing driven with the same kinematics. For all Reynolds numbers, the lift generated per unit driving power is also enhanced in a similar manner. The wake capture mechanism is enhanced, due to a stronger flow around the wing at stroke reversal, resulting from a stronger end of stroke vortex at the trailing edge. The present study provides some clues about how flexibility affects the aerodynamic performance in low Reynolds number flapping flight. In addition, it points to the importance of considering non-linear resonances for enhancing aerodynamic performance.

[1]  Max M Munk.  Note on the Air Forces on a Wing Caused by Pitching. , 1925 .

[2]  C. Ellington.  The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. VI. Lift and Power Requirements , 1984 .

[3]  A. R. Ennos.  INERTIAL AND AERODYNAMIC TORQUES ON THE WINGS OF DIPTERA IN FLIGHT , 1989 .

[4]  A. H. Nayfeh,et al.  Nonlinear Resonances in a Flexible Cantilever Beam , 1994 .

[5]  A. Nayfeh,et al.  Applied nonlinear dynamics : analytical, computational, and experimental methods , 1995 .

[6]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[7]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  K. Kawachi,et al.  A Numerical Study of Insect Flight , 1998 .

[9]  C. Ellington.  The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  R. Wootton.  Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[12]  Z. J. Wang.  Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Z. J. Wang.  Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering , 2000 .

[14]  Herbert Rc.  Modelling insect wings using the finite element method. , 2001 .

[15]  Lijiang Zeng,et al.  Measuring the camber deformation of a dragonfly wing using projected comb fringe , 2001 .

[16]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[17]  Thomas L Daniel,et al.  Flexible Wings and Fins: Bending by Inertial or Fluid-Dynamic Forces?1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[18]  Mao Sun,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  R. Ramamurti,et al.  A three-dimensional computational study of the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  R J Wootton,et al.  Approaches to the structural modelling of insect wings. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  T. Daniel,et al.  Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[22]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[23]  E. Balaras.  Modeling complex boundaries using an external force field on fixed Cartesian grids in large-eddy simulations , 2004 .

[24]  C. Peskin,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics of `clap and fling' in the smallest insects , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  M. Uhlmann.  An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows , 2005, 1809.08170.

[26]  Elias Balaras,et al.  An embedded-boundary formulation for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows interacting with moving boundaries , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[27]  J.-M. Miao,et al.  Effect of flexure on aerodynamic propulsive efficiency of flapping flexible airfoil , 2006 .

[28]  Hu Jin-song,et al.  VISCOELASTIC CONSTITUTIVE MODEL RELATED TO DEFORMATION OF INSECT WING UNDER LOADING IN FLAPPING MOTION , 2006 .

[29]  Gordon J. Berman,et al.  Energy-minimizing kinematics in hovering insect flight , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  R. Ramamurti,et al.  A computational investigation of the three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamics of Drosophila hovering and maneuvering , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  Elias Balaras,et al.  A strongly coupled, embedded-boundary method for fluid–structure interactions of elastically mounted rigid bodies , 2008 .