Recommended number of strides for automatic assessment of gait symmetry and regularity in above-knee amputees by means of accelerometry and autocorrelation analysis

BackgroundSymmetry and regularity of gait are essential outcomes of gait retraining programs, especially in lower-limb amputees. This study aims presenting an algorithm to automatically compute symmetry and regularity indices, and assessing the minimum number of strides for appropriate evaluation of gait symmetry and regularity through autocorrelation of acceleration signals.MethodsTen transfemoral amputees (AMP) and ten control subjects (CTRL) were studied. Subjects wore an accelerometer and were asked to walk for 70 m at their natural speed (twice). Reference values of step and stride regularity indices (Ad1 and Ad2) were obtained by autocorrelation analysis of the vertical and antero-posterior acceleration signals, excluding initial and final strides. The Ad1 and Ad2 coefficients were then computed at different stages by analyzing increasing portions of the signals (considering both the signals cleaned by initial and final strides, and the whole signals). At each stage, the difference between Ad1 and Ad2 values and the corresponding reference values were compared with the minimum detectable difference, MDD, of the index. If that difference was less than MDD, it was assumed that the portion of signal used in the analysis was of sufficient length to allow reliable estimation of the autocorrelation coefficient.ResultsAll Ad1 and Ad2 indices were lower in AMP than in CTRL (P < 0.0001). Excluding initial and final strides from the analysis, the minimum number of strides needed for reliable computation of step symmetry and stride regularity was about 2.2 and 3.5, respectively. Analyzing the whole signals, the minimum number of strides increased to about 15 and 20, respectively.ConclusionsWithout the need to identify and eliminate the phases of gait initiation and termination, twenty strides can provide a reasonable amount of information to reliably estimate gait regularity in transfemoral amputees.

[1]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Laura Rocchi,et al.  Gait symmetry and regularity in transfemoral amputees assessed by trunk accelerations , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  B. Auvinet,et al.  Accelerometric gait analysis for use in hospital outpatients. , 1999, Revue du rhumatisme.

[4]  D. Potvin,et al.  Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Philippe Terrier,et al.  Prescription footwear for severe injuries of foot and ankle: effect on regularity and symmetry of the gait assessed by trunk accelerometry. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[6]  C. Terwee,et al.  When to use agreement versus reliability measures. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  I. Campanini,et al.  Reliability, smallest real difference and concurrent validity of indices computed from GRF components in gait of stroke patients. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[8]  Susan J Hillman,et al.  Repeatability of a new observational gait score for unilateral lower limb amputees. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[9]  Jorunn L Helbostad,et al.  Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Monitoring Motor Fluctuations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Sensors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[11]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  P. Bonato.  Clinical applications of wearable technology , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  J. D. Morrison,et al.  Amputee walking training: a preliminary study of biomechanical measurements of stance and balance. , 1988, International disability studies.

[14]  R. Gailey,et al.  Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  B Christensen,et al.  The effect of prosthetic rehabilitation in lower limb amputees , 1995, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[16]  J. Weir.  Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[17]  A. Lees,et al.  Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[18]  K. Hagberg,et al.  Physiological cost index (PCI) and walking performance in individuals with transfemoral prostheses compared to healthy controls , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.