A Time-Domain Subspace Technique for Estimating Visual Evoked Potential Latencies

Summary Estimating a visual evoked potential (VEP) from the human brain is challenging since its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is generally very low. An optimization and eigen-decompositionbased subspace approach has been investigated and tested to estimate the latencies of visual evoked potential (VEP) signals which are highly corrupted by spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) waveforms that can be considered as colored noise. This scheme termed as the generalized subspace approach (GSA) depends on the generalized eigendecomposition of the covariance matrices of the VEP and the colored EEG noise. The subspace algorithm jointly transforms these two correlation matrices into diagonal matrices, which can then be segregated into signal subspace and noise subspace. Enhancement is performed by removing the noise subspace and estimating the clean VEP signal from the remaining signal subspace. Further, GSA has been compared with a third-order correlation (TOC) method, using both realistic simulation and real patient data gathered in a hospital. The simulation results produced by the GSA algorithm show more faithful reproduction of VEP waveforms, and a higher degree of consistencies in detecting the P100, P200, and P300 peaks. Additionally, the results of the real patient data confirm the superiority of GSA over TOC in estimating VEP's P100 latencies, which are used by clinicians to assess the conduction of electrical signals from the subjects' retinas to the visual cortex parts of their brains.

[1]  D. Regan.  Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[2]  John W. Auer,et al.  Linear algebra with applications , 1996 .

[3]  Xiao-Hu Yu,et al.  Time-varying adaptive filters for evoked potential estimation , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  G. Henning,et al.  Statistical detection of visually evoked potentials , 1995 .

[5]  Yariv Ephraim,et al.  A signal subspace approach for speech enhancement , 1995, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[6]  P M Rossini,et al.  Clinical utility of evoked potentials. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[7]  P. Husar,et al.  Bispectrum analysis of visually evoked potentials , 1997, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[8]  T. Demiralp,et al.  An RBF approach to single trial VEP estimation , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 2nd International Conference Biomedical Engineering Days.

[9]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Noise reduction in brain evoked potentials based on third-order correlations , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Efficient extraction of evoked potentials by combination of Wiener filtering and subspace methods , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[11]  R. Fitzpatrick.  eMedicine , 2002, Medical reference services quarterly.

[12]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Nidal S. Kamel,et al.  Extracting Single Trial Visual Evoked Potentials using Selective Eigen-Rate Principal Components , 2005, IEC.

[14]  X. Xiong,et al.  Extracting ERP by combination of Subspace Method and Lift Wavelet Transform , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[15]  Bernard C. Levy,et al.  Principles of Signal Detection and Parameter Estimation , 2008 .