Estimation of the efficiencies and uncertainties of the extraction and cleanup steps of pesticide residue determination in cucumber using 14C-carbaryl

The estimation of the uncertainty of measurement has, nowadays, become an integral part of analytical results. The uncertainty and efficiency of extraction and cleanup are very important components of a pesticide residue analytical method. In this work, for a quick review of extraction and cleanup efficiency and to evaluate the individual analysis steps during method adaptation, 14C-carbaryl was applied at all fortification levels. Then, further analyses, such as ethylacetate extraction, filtration, evaporation and cleanup, were performed. The calibration of gel chromatograph column, performed with both 14C-carbaryl and fortification mixture (dichlorvos, malathion and chlorpyrifos), showed that pesticide fractions came through the column between the 8- and 23-mL fractions. The overall recovery of 14C-carbaryl after the extraction and cleanup step was 0.91, with the relative uncertainty of 0.084. Using the “bottom-up” approach, the uncertainty of extraction ucEX and cleanup ucGPC were 0.033 and 0.107, respectively. The combined standard uncertainty uc associated with the described analytical method was 0.112. Similar values were obtained using the alternative “top-down” approach: uncertainty of extraction uct1 was 0.039, uncertainty of cleanup uct2 was 0.108 and the combined standard uncertainty ucAV was 0.081. Both approaches showed that the uncertainty of cleanup was the main source of combined standard uncertainty.

[1]  M. F. L'annunziata Radiotracers in agricultural chemistry , 1979 .

[2]  A. Fajgelj,et al.  Testing efficientcy and uncertainty of sample processing using 14C-labelled chlorpyrifos: Part II , 2000 .

[3]  O. Tiryaki,et al.  Estimation of sample processing uncertainty for chlorpyrifos residue in cucumber , 2006 .

[4]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2002 .

[5]  Carlos G. Bell,et al.  LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING , 1959 .

[6]  M. Veber,et al.  Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the determination of jasmonic acid in Lemna minor L. by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection , 2007 .

[7]  Á. Ambrus,et al.  A Cost-Effective Screening Method for Pesticide Residue Analysis in Fruits, Vegetables, and Cereal Grains , 2005, Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes.

[8]  P. Aysal,et al.  Validation of thin layer chromatographic methods for pesticide residue analysis. , 2005 .

[9]  O. Tiryaki Method validation for the analysis of pesticide residues in grain by thin-layer chromatography , 2006 .

[10]  Luis Cuadros-Rodríguez,et al.  Assessment of uncertainty in pesticide multiresidue analytical methods: main sources and estimation , 2002 .

[11]  S. Lehotay,et al.  Comparison of solid-phase extraction sorbents for cleanup in pesticide residue analysis of fresh fruits and vegetables , 2002 .

[12]  P. Aysal,et al.  Applicability of TLC in Multiresidue Methods for the Determination of Pesticides in Wheat Grain , 2005, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[13]  J. Hajšlová,et al.  Uncertainties of gas chromatographic measurement of troublesome pesticide residues in apples employing conventional and mass spectrometric detectors , 2004 .

[14]  Á. Ambrus,et al.  Estimation of Efficiency of Processing Soil Samples for Pesticide Residues Analysis , 2006, Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes.