GENETIC ALGORITHM MODEL FOR PROFIT MAXIMIZATION OF GENERATING COMPANIES IN DEREGULATED ELECTRICITY MARKETS

In deregulated and rapidly changing electricity markets, there is strong interest on how to solve the new price-based unit commitment (PBUC) problem used by each generating company to optimize its generation schedule in order to maximize its profit. This article proposes a genetic algorithm (GA) solution to the PBUC problem. The advantages of the proposed GA are: 1) flexibility in modeling problem constraints because the PBUC problem is not decomposed either by time or by unit; 2) smooth and easier convergence to the optimum solution thanks to the proposed variable fitness function which not only penalizes solutions that violate the constraints but also this penalization is smoothly increasing as the number of generations increases; 3) easy implementation to work on parallel computers, and 4) production of multiple unit commitment schedules, some of which may be well suited to situations that may arise quickly due to unexpected contingencies. The method has been applied to systems of up to 120 units and the results show that the proposed GA constantly outperforms the Lagrangian relaxation PBUC method for systems with more than 60 units. Moreover, the difference between the worst and the best GA solution is very small, ranging from 0.10% to 0.49%.

[1]  Pavlos S. Georgilakis,et al.  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOLUTION TO ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECASTING PROBLEM , 2007, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[2]  E. Allen,et al.  Price-Based Commitment Decisions in the Electricity Market , 1998 .

[3]  Y. W. Wong,et al.  Thermal generator scheduling using hybrid genetic/simulated-annealing approach , 1995 .

[4]  Samer Takriti,et al.  Incorporating Fuel Constraints and Electricity Spot Prices into the Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem , 2000, Oper. Res..

[5]  Singiresu S. Rao Engineering Optimization : Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[6]  Y. H. Song,et al.  Prediction of System Marginal Prices by Wavelet Transform and Neural Networks , 2000 .

[7]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Market operations in electric power systems , 2002 .

[8]  G. B. Shrestha,et al.  Price-based unit commitment for bidding under price uncertainty , 2007 .

[9]  Hiroshi Sasaki,et al.  A solution method of unit commitment by artificial neural networks , 1992 .

[10]  Gerald B. Sheblé,et al.  Genetic-based unit commitment algorithm , 1996 .

[11]  Raj Aggarwal,et al.  Advanced hybrid genetic algorithm for short-term generation scheduling , 2001 .

[12]  Francisco D. Galiana,et al.  Unit commitment by simulated annealing , 1990 .

[13]  J. Contreras,et al.  ARIMA Models to Predict Next-Day Electricity Prices , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[14]  Pedro Correia,et al.  Decentralised unit commitment in a market structure: problem formulation and solution advancement , 2006 .

[15]  J. R. McDonald,et al.  Knowledge-based genetic algorithm for unit commitment , 2001 .

[16]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[17]  C. Wang,et al.  Decomposition Approach to Nonlinear Multiarea Generation Scheduling with Tie-line Constraints Using Expert Systems , 1992, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[18]  A. Conejo,et al.  Optimal Response of a Power Generator to Energy, AGC, and Reserve Pool-Based Markets , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[19]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[20]  Walter L. Snyder,et al.  Dynamic Programming Approach to Unit Commitment , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[22]  Francisco D. Galiana,et al.  Towards a more rigorous and practical unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation , 1988 .

[23]  L. F. B. Baptistella,et al.  A Decomposition Approach to Problem of Unit Commitment Schedule for Hydrothermal Systems , 1980 .

[24]  A. Conejo,et al.  Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market , 2000 .

[25]  Gerald B. Sheblé,et al.  Unit commitment literature synopsis , 1994 .

[26]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Price-based unit commitment: a case of Lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  A solution to the unit-commitment problem using integer-coded genetic algorithm , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Tomonobu Senjyu,et al.  Fast technique for unit commitment by genetic algorithm based on unit clustering , 2005 .

[29]  G. Sheblé,et al.  Power generation operation and control — 2nd edition , 1996 .

[30]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[31]  J. Contreras,et al.  Price-Maker Self-Scheduling in a Pool-Based Electricity Market: A Mixed-Integer LP Approach , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[32]  Arthur I. Cohen,et al.  A Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Unit Commitment , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.